Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Darksheare

OK, that makes sense, kind of, that the turbulence caused by a plane might be detected, what with temperature differences.

But I am assuming that radar cannot detect clear air turbulence that has no machinery associated with it.


2,571 posted on 05/14/2004 6:20:09 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2566 | View Replies ]


To: Sam Cree; Darksheare

This is gonna play hell with my antigravity experiments. Dang it.


2,574 posted on 05/14/2004 6:22:58 PM PDT by Ramius (There may come a time when the strength of men fails, but it is NOT THIS DAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2571 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Cree

One of the early high powered radar systems detected simple air currents, like heavy breezes and such.
The main problem at the time wasn't power output, but filtering the data.
Anything that would disturb a smple radio signal can be detected by radar.
It's the processing of the return signal and catching whether or not it's important that is difficult.

Something new is 'bistatic radar.'
Basically emitter and receiver are seperated, mounted on vehicles miles apart.
However, there's a glut of info generated by this, air currents, birds in flight and such.
Computers currently available cannot filter the info yet.
But I suspsect that it will be useable soon.


2,575 posted on 05/14/2004 6:29:17 PM PDT by Darksheare (Bretheren & Sisteren In Chaos Inc, LLC "We're All About Bad Ideas!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2571 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson