To: RosieCotton
The same one. The lion was pretty good, except that his mouth didn't move in sync with what he was saying, which was a bit disconcerting.Yeah, now that you mention it I remember that.
But many of the other animals weren't exactly realistic, to say the least.
I guess I don't remember the other animals, I just remember the lion. There was an earlier cartoon adaptation which I liked better than that one. BTW, I read recently about a proposed movie adaptation--did you hear about that?
To: Fedora
Do you remember the beavers? Those are the ones that stick the most in my memory. People in big, awkward, obviously rubber beaver suits.
Yeah...I've heard that they're doing another adaptation...and that Disney may be heading it up. I'm trying to hope for the best. But with a movie that is FAR more analogous than LOTR, I'm a little worried. I don't think it's possible to MAKE it without Christian symbolism, but they'll probably try. Grrrr.
14,227 posted on
03/12/2004 12:11:10 PM PST by
RosieCotton
(Anything worth doing is worth doing badly. - G. K. Chesterton)
To: Fedora; All
Ok- Happy Camper Alert.
Not only is it FRIDAY!!! (yaaaay)
BUT
A major component of my current project... WORKED! (the first time even).
I'm dancing like Snoopy. Oh happy day!
14,232 posted on
03/12/2004 12:16:02 PM PST by
Lil'freeper
(By all that we hold dear on this good Earth I bid you stand, men of the West!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson