[null and void]

I'm having real trouble seeing myself voting for a president that thinks it's A-OK to keep the borders open, grant a don't-call-it-an-amnesty-amnesty to everyone who has managed to commit a felony by illegally entering this country, do all he can to provide jobs for everyone except American citizens, supports anal probes of grannies at the airport, while forbidding searching møøselimbs because that would be profiling, gave a huge grant to the NEA, has decided that there are LOTS of jobs that "Americans won't do" and wants to give them to any foreigner who wants them at starvation wages, has done NOTHING to discourage outsourcing, won't impose tariffs...

What does it profit us to win the war on terror, and lose our livelihoods, homes, civilization and future?

At least with a member of the stupid party (or was that the evil party, who can really tell the difference?) as president the conservatives would have the sense to keep an eye on him!

[Mo1]

I disagree

[Conservababe]

Well, if you feel that way...the least you can do is vote for Ralph Nader.

[.38sw]

At least with a member of the stupid party (or was that the evil party, who can really tell the difference?) as president the conservatives would have the sense to keep an eye on him!

I'm having to agree with you here. It seems that the best way to keep things somewhat in check is to have a divided government - one party in control of Congress while another party is in control of the White House.

Gridlock can be our friend.

[sweetliberty]

Go Nully! I don't think I've ever seen you quite so wound up. Free country? Yeah, I remember when we used to say that too. Been a long time since it really meant anything though. And as time goes on, there will be less and less of us who can actually remember what it was like.