Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Darksheare
THE SUPREME COURT TRASHES THE 1ST AMENDMENT
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=106&u=/nypost/20031211/cm_nypost/thesupremecourttrashesthe1stamendment&printer=1

When it comes right down to it, who really needs the First Amendment anyway?

2,856 posted on 12/11/2003 3:47:46 PM PST by restornu ( "The biggest room in the world; is the room for improvement.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2855 | View Replies ]


To: restornu
WEll..
It's basically been abridged anyway.
There's free speech as long as it's offensive to conservatives, but should it offend libs..
"The law prohibits the use of "soft money" - large, unregulated donations to political parties from corporations and unions." That part was okay, that has nothing to do with free speech.

"More significant, the law forbids "issue ads" that mention a candidate by name within 60 days of a general election and 30 days of primaries.
In essence, this means that just when voters want information the most - even if it is from an interested party - they won't be getting it."
THIS PART is the killer.
2,859 posted on 12/11/2003 4:24:56 PM PST by Darksheare (For the crimes of Heresy of thought, Heresy of word, and Heresy of deed, this tagline shall burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2856 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson