Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Letitring
Sure hope so.

But at that altitude, they would likely have to be under sea level, wouldn't they?

How easily compromised in a big blast? I don't think it would take too much to make DC a bay of the Atlantic, would it?

I wonder, how far along is the project to put the Library of Congress into digital form? What a massive project that is!
6,650 posted on 01/05/2004 11:09:17 AM PST by Quix (Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6644 | View Replies ]


To: Quix
That entire project got a big boost from Laura Bush. I've heard, through a friend of mine, it's about 1/3 there. Not sure AT ALL how accurate that is. You can hear anything. Still, this person works there is not given to dramatization, about anything. :)

Those vaults under the Smith are SUPPOSED to be blast proof. I dunno, for sure, of course. I guess divers could go retrieve them, one day. good grief.

I really don't think DC is in the nuke camp. For some reason, I see that city attacked via germs, chemicals and firebombs. I'm thinking if we went over all those postings and threats from AQ and associates for the past 2 years, we'd pretty much be able to tell, in general, what the plan is. From what I've read, so far, the imagery and threats are clearer for nukes in NYC.
6,659 posted on 01/05/2004 11:19:37 AM PST by Letitring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6650 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson