Replies

Honestly, the only question I have (and it leaves me sceptical) is how someone might have deliberately constructed the 3-image sequence and then added the three specific parts of the search term deliberately. None of the images have anything obvious associated with them, e.g., "luxor" doesn't appear as an association with the Luxor image. (You can see the associations by clicking on the image and then "info" underneath)
< Indeed. So if jihadis somehow stumbled across Mr Wacker's website, they would have no way of finding, for example, the middle image of the plane, because the only terms associated with it are: [5] hu
[2] 7:30
[1] involved
[2] pissb
[3] t-shirts

I am satisfied with my original take on this: the 3 images got randomly assiged to the 3 words when Mr. Lomax originally submitted the search term on the twexus site.

"...the 3 images got randomly assiged to the 3 words when Mr. Lomax originally submitted the search term on the twexus site."

No, again I did not submit the words. The existed there because somebody else, probably EOM, made the connections to them.

To be clear,
what i did was a google for "Alhaam hu Akhbar" which is the phrase EOM posted three times each in two separate posts at 7:30 and 7:39 PM EST this evening.

The google on that phrase was a big zero burger. Nothing.

Then I noticed at the top of the page was the question: Did you mean to search for "Ahlam hu Akhbar".

There were two hits. 2 hits. I chose the second one and the page at the nexus site popped up with those specific images. I did not search for them on the twexus site...the associations for those specific arabic words were pre-existing since 30 december 2003...two full days before I stumbled upon the page during a routine search.

hope that clears it up.

The twesus site is imho used by AQ or somebody with ill intent for America.

the 3 images got randomly assiged to the 3 words when Mr. Lomax originally submitted the search term on the twexus site.

All due deference, Getmain, but that's an awfully strange example of randomness, considering what's discussed on this thread and other obvious circumstances.

Did you see anything about the bracketed numbers next to the association terms? I checked to see if they were realtime updates on the hits to a term, but the numbers didn't increment.