Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mhking
When this thread was started with the Debka article on Nov. 3, it looked like tin foil stuff for many. And of course most of us would prefer that we were just being paranoid.

But now it's looking more and more like there is a great deal of truth in those bits and pieces of information.

Another point, that is not being made significantly enough, is that the government raised the bar for raising the threat alert.

"In September, the government raised the bar for changing the threat level, saying it would only elevate the status if there was specific and credible information about an attack."

If they raised the bar, that means that now they do have strong specific information, maybe based on the old definition we would be at red alert.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/12/22/TERROR.TMP
2,677 posted on 12/21/2003 8:52:03 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2675 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
If they raised the bar, that means that now they do have strong specific information, maybe based on the old definition we would be at red alert.

.I was thinking the same thing. According to several LEO's that I spoke to yesterday, we in NY have some things to worry about.

2,763 posted on 12/22/2003 4:40:46 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2677 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson