Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Guild 10-14-2003 Donald Rumsfeld Appreciation Day
defenselink ^

Posted on 10/14/2003 6:08:44 AM PDT by BigWaveBetty

It must be Donald Rumsfeld's turn to be whipping boy this month with talk of his rollercoaster ride taking a downward turn and in-fighting is losing Iraq and could cost Rumsfeld his job. Bullbleep I say!

I for one think America should be eternally grateful that Donald Rumsfeld is our Secretary of Defense. He works incredibly hard for us at a time when most Americans his age are enjoying retirement.

BIOGRAPHY

THE HONORABLE DONALD RUMSFELD

Secretary of Defense

Donald H. Rumsfeld was sworn in as the 21st Secretary of Defense on January 20, 2001. Before assuming his present post, the former Navy pilot had also served as the 13th Secretary of Defense, White House Chief of Staff, U.S. Ambassador to NATO, U.S. Congressman and chief executive officer of two Fortune 500 companies.

Secretary Rumsfeld is responsible for directing the actions of the Defense Department in response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The war is being waged against a backdrop of major change within the Department of Defense. The department has developed a new defense strategy and replaced the old model for sizing forces with a newer approach more relevant to the 21st century. Secretary Rumsfeld proposed and the President approved a significant reorganization of the worldwide command structure, known as the Unified Command Plan, that resulted in the establishment of the U.S. Northern Command and the U.S. Strategic Command, the latter charged with the responsibilities formerly held by the Strategic and Space Commands which were disestablished.

The Department also has refocused its space capabilities and fashioned a new concept of strategic deterrence that increases security while reducing strategic nuclear weapons. To help strengthen the deterrent, the missile defense research and testing program has been reorganized and revitalized, free of the restraints of the ABM treaty.

Mr. Rumsfeld attended Princeton University on academic and NROTC scholarships (A.B., 1954) and served in the U.S. Navy (1954-57) as an aviator and flight instructor. In 1957, he transferred to the Ready Reserve and continued his Naval service in flying and administrative assignments as a drilling reservist until 1975. He transferred to the Standby Reserve when he became Secretary of Defense in 1975 and to the Retired Reserve with the rank of Captain in 1989.

In 1957, he came to Washington, DC to serve as Administrative Assistant to a Congressman. After a stint with an investment banking firm, he was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives from Illinois in 1962, at the age of 30, and was re-elected in 1964, 1966, and 1968.

Mr. Rumsfeld resigned from Congress in 1969 during his fourth term to join the President's Cabinet. From 1969 to 1970, he served as Director of the Office of Economic Opportunity and Assistant to the President. From 1971 to 1972, he was Counsellor to the President and Director of the Economic Stabilization Program. In 1973, he left Washington, DC, to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Brussels, Belgium (1973-1974).

In August 1974, he was called back to Washington, DC, to serve as Chairman of the transition to the Presidency of Gerald R. Ford. He then became Chief of Staff of the White House and a member of the President's Cabinet (1974-1975). He served as the 13th U.S. Secretary of Defense, the youngest in the country's history (1975-1977).

From 1977 to 1985 he served as Chief Executive Officer, President, and then Chairman of G.D. Searle & Co., a worldwide pharmaceutical company. The successful turnaround there earned him awards as the Outstanding Chief Executive Officer in the Pharmaceutical Industry from the Wall Street Transcript (1980) and Financial World (1981). From 1985 to 1990 he was in private business.

Mr. Rumsfeld served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of General Instrument Corporation from 1990 to 1993. General Instrument Corporation was a leader in broadband transmission, distribution, and access control technologies. Until being sworn in as the 21st Secretary of Defense, Mr. Rumsfeld served as Chairman of the Board of Gilead Sciences, Inc., a pharmaceutical company.

Before returning for his second tour as Secretary of Defense, Mr. Rumsfeld chaired the bipartisan U.S. Ballistic Missile Threat Commission, in 1998, and the U.S. Commission to Assess National Security Space Management and Organization, in 2000.

During his business career, Mr. Rumsfeld continued his public service in a variety of Federal posts, including:

Member of the President's General Advisory Committee on Arms Control (1982 - 1986);
Special Presidential Envoy on the Law of the Sea Treaty (1982 - 1983);
Senior Advisor to the President's Panel on Strategic Systems (1983 - 1984);
Member of the U.S. Joint Advisory Commission on U.S./Japan Relations (1983 - 1984);
Special Presidential Envoy to the Middle East (1983 - 1984);
Member of the National Commission on Public Service (1987 - 1990);
Member of the National Economic Commission (1988 - 1989);
Member of the Board of Visitors of the National Defense University (1988 - 1992);
Member of the Commission on U.S./Japan Relations (1989 - 1991); and
Member of the U.S. Trade Deficit Review Commission (1999 - 2000).

While in the private sector, Mr. Rumsfeld's civic activities included service as a member of the National Academy of Public Administration and a member of the boards of trustees of the Gerald R. Ford Foundation, the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, and the National Park Foundation, and as Chairman of the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships, Inc.

In 1977, Mr. Rumsfeld was awarded the nation's highest civilian award, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.



TOPICS: The Guild
KEYWORDS: theguild
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last
To: Iowa Granny
Please pass me the pipe Dennis - you've had quite enough.

The Goddess of Peace? Come'on, my man.
21 posted on 10/14/2003 2:44:23 PM PDT by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lodwick
Somehow, I just knew you were really going to love that quote! ;>)
22 posted on 10/14/2003 2:48:04 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (Only 97 Days until the Iowa Caucuses,,,,, then Iowans will be rid of these DigBats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
DENNIS! DENNIS KUCINICH?!

THIS IS THE BIG GIANT HEAD. WHAT WAS THAT GODDESS OF PEACE BUSINESS?! GET BACK TO OUR PLANET AT ONCE, YOU IDIOT!

----End Transmission.........


23 posted on 10/14/2003 2:52:12 PM PDT by BigWaveBetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Timeout
A little Best of the Web, 10-13:

Was She Covert? Apparently Not.
The Valerie Plame kerfuffle seems to be fuffling out. Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times offers "a few pertinent facts" about her career:

First, the C.I.A. suspected that Aldrich Ames had given Mrs. Wilson's name (along with those of other spies) to the Russians before his espionage arrest in 1994. So her undercover security was undermined at that time, and she was brought back to Washington for safety reasons.

Second, as Mrs. Wilson rose in the agency, she was already in transition away from undercover work to management, and to liaison roles with other intelligence agencies. So this year, even before she was outed, she was moving away from "noc"--which means non-official cover, like pretending to be a business executive. After passing as an energy analyst for Brewster-Jennings & Associates, a C.I.A. front company, she was switching to a new cover as a State Department official, affording her diplomatic protection without having "C.I.A." stamped on her forehead.

Third, Mrs. Wilson's intelligence connections became known a bit in Washington as she rose in the C.I.A. and moved to State Department cover, but her job remained a closely held secret. Even her classmates in the C.I.A.'s career training program mostly knew her only as Valerie P. That way, if one spook defected, the damage would be limited.

Now, let's go back to the beginning of this kerfuffle. The Nation's David Corn claimed on July 16 that the identification of Plame as a CIA "operative" in Bob Novak's column two days earlier was a "potential violation" of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, under which, in Corn's words, "it is a crime for anyone who has access to classified information to disclose intentionally information identifying a covert agent."

Under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, an employee of an intelligence service is a "covert agent" only if he has worked overseas within the past five years. Thus if Kristof is right, there is no violation here. Where did Corn get the idea that Plame was a covert agent? From her husband, Joseph Wilson, it would appear:

Without acknowledging whether she is a deep-cover CIA employee, Wilson says, "Naming her this way would have compromised every operation, every relationship, every network with which she had been associated in her entire career. This is the stuff of Kim Philby and Aldrich Ames."

This Joe Wilson is a clever one, isn't he? He didn't actually say his wife was a covert agent, so he can't quite be accused of lying. But if Kristof's account of Plame's career is accurate, Wilson misled Corn (as well as others who followed his lead, including Kristof's colleague Paul Krugman) by making a hypothetical statement based on a premise he knew to be false, which gave journalists hostile to the Bush administration all they needed to make an accusation of criminal wrongdoing.

24 posted on 10/14/2003 3:04:50 PM PDT by BigWaveBetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
I had wondered about eharmony since they've begun advertising normal looking people in their commercials. But I'm not about to give out personal info on the internet - it seems a bit dangerous and very weird to meet someone that way. And Gran's right, the 35 year olds can't afford us.
25 posted on 10/14/2003 3:07:25 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
Leftist profs are a dime a dozen at Yale. The Ivy League is full of these people. I would scream bloody murder before I'd let one of my nephews attend an Ivy League school or Berzerkeley or Stanford or Wisconsin or Michigan or Texas.
26 posted on 10/14/2003 3:12:12 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
RE: Ian and Chels -- For Cripes Sake, Ian RUNNNNNNNNNNN!!! I'd hate to see any man sacrificed on the Clinton alter.

This relationship sounds rather obsessive. Dump her while you've still got a shred of dignity, Ian. Either that or stock up on grocery bags, because the glow of love is gonna eventually wear off, but that face will live forever. Just look at mama.
27 posted on 10/14/2003 3:17:42 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
Yes, very dangerous to put your pertinent info out on the net.

However, people do it. Pre-Internet, there was a young man from our community who employed a dating service and found a woman. They've been married almost 15 years. Have 4 kids. He's still as wierd as the day he sought out the dating service. She appears relatively normal, has a BS in Nursing and is employed by the U of I Hospitals.

Actually, for busy people, who have careers to maintain, I can see it might elimiate a good deal of wasted time. So, in my mind, the practicality of the process is there, it's just the Psyco Factor I am leary of. I wouldn't encourage any of my friends to try it. I'd fix 'em up instead.
28 posted on 10/14/2003 3:17:47 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (Only 97 Days until the Iowa Caucuses,,,,, then Iowans will be rid of these DigBats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
No kidding, Kucinich actually said that? What do they put in the water in Cleveland?
29 posted on 10/14/2003 3:18:43 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
OK, so I'm waiting for the introduction to one of your bachelor-farmer friends.
30 posted on 10/14/2003 3:23:33 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: daisyscarlett
Why did the San Francisco Bay Area vote against recalling Gov. Gray Davis, while virtually the entire rest of the state went the other way? The San Francisco Chronicle poses the question, and Orville Schell, dean of the journalism school at the University of California, Berkeley, offered this answer: "It strikes me that the better educated people are, more often than not, they tend to be more liberal, and I think this is a very well-educated area."

It's easy to dismiss this as mere ideological prejudice, which it no doubt is. But Schell's statement that better-educated people tend to be more liberal is subject to empirical testing. Here are the findings of the Edison Media Research California exit poll on the recall, broken down by education level (the second column shows the percentage of the total sample that each subgroup makes up):

 
%
Yes
No
Did not complete high school
3%
--
--
High school grad
13%
61%
39%
Some college/associate degree
32%
59%
41%
College grad
28%
57%
43%
Postgraduate study
23%
45%
55%

And here are the findings for the vote on Davis's replacement (CB is Democrat Cruz Bustamante; AS is Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger; TM is Republican Tom McClintock; PC is Green Peter Camejo):

 
%
CB
AS
TM
PC
Did not complete high school
3%
--
--
--
--
High school grad
13%
33%
50%
12%
2%
Some college/associate degree
33%
30%
48%
14%
4%
College grad
28%
32%
49%
13%
3%
Postgraduate study
23%
44%
38%
10%
5%

Looking at these figures, we see small differences among high school and college grads, among whom more education seems to correlate slightly with less support for the recall; 62% of each of the three groups voted Republican and 34% or 35% either Democrat or Green. The real outliers are those who've done postgraduate study, who actually opposed the recall and a plurality of whom (49%) voted Democrat or Green (vs. 48% GOP).

There appears to be another outlying group, too: high school dropouts. Because they made up such a small part of the sample, the pollsters were not able to generate definitive numbers. They do, however, give combined percentages for those whose education level is "high school or less": 58% to 42% in favor of the recall, 58% Republican, 38% Democrat or Green.

Based on these numbers, we've derived the following figures for high school dropouts: Against the recall, 55% to 45% (the same proportions as postgrads), and on the replacement ballot 51% Democrat or Green, 41% Republican. Take these numbers with a grain of salt; they aren't statistically reliable. But they are suggestive.

The Democratic "base," it seems, can be found at the extreme edges of the bell curve, consisting of a small number of uneducated voters and a large number of overeducated ones. The educated elite, as we suggested last week, clearly dominates the party. One lesson of the California election, though, is that it's possible to be highly intelligent and educated without being all that smart. If you add together all the Orville Schell types in the California Democratic Party, we bet they have a collective IQ of over a million. But the best idea they could come up with is to tell people to vote for Gray Davis?

Best of the Web

31 posted on 10/14/2003 3:31:47 PM PDT by BigWaveBetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
I know many Humanities teachers/profs. are a bit loopy but this guy is a loopy one man band. There probably aren't many universities left that aren't full of loopy lefties with just a few token profs that don't indoctrinate liberal ideals. *sigh*
32 posted on 10/14/2003 3:40:12 PM PDT by BigWaveBetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lodwick
News of the Weird
Al Gore and some liberal investors are "about two weeks away" from striking a deal to acquire Newsworld International, a cable network they plan to remake into a liberal news channel. But AdAge reports they're hoping to avoid the "liberal" label (just like every other liberal news channel). "Instead, it will be aimed at the under-25 crowd," AdAge reports. An unnamed adviser characterizes it as a combination between liberal news channel CNN and liberal music channel MTV.

Meanwhile, Fox News Channel reports on a new poll of Americans' beliefs about the supernatural. The partisan breakdown is interesting:

Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say they believe in God (by eight percentage points), in heaven (by 10 points), in hell (by 15 points), and considerably more likely to believe in the devil (by 17 points). Democrats are more likely than Republicans to say they believe in reincarnation (by 14 percentage points), in astrology (by 14 points), in ghosts (by eight points) and UFOs (by five points).

Seems to us Gore & Co. are missing an opportunity to throw the Sci-Fi Channel into the mix.

Look out!! It's the big sweaty gay monster with no eyebrows!!

33 posted on 10/14/2003 4:01:15 PM PDT by BigWaveBetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
I'm waiting for the introduction to one of your bachelor-farmer friends.

None I know are worthy of you, my dear.

34 posted on 10/14/2003 4:06:37 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (Only 97 Days until the Iowa Caucuses,,,,, then Iowans will be rid of these DigBats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor; BigWaveBetty; Iowa Granny
And Gran's right, the 35 year olds can't afford us.

Yep - you've met (not hooked) up with IG, and KNOW that this is one seriously high-maintenance lady.

Paupers, the unemployed, and other gold-diggers need not apply there...come back and see us when the cash in bank reads Ten Million, or more.

Cheers guys.
35 posted on 10/14/2003 4:20:13 PM PDT by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
Come'on now...your alma mater is quickly becoming just as whacked as the rest of us.

Do look forward to TurkeyDay - with the genius of Mack, and his "coaches," you could kick our asses...or at least pull out the victory.

Cheers up there,E.
36 posted on 10/14/2003 4:25:08 PM PDT by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
LMAO - algore, and any investment is just toooooo laughable - thanks so much for this report!

God, help, and save us all.

Cheers guys.
37 posted on 10/14/2003 5:13:23 PM PDT by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: lodwick
this is one seriously high-maintenance lady.

Sir, are you implying it takes a lot of money to cover my flaws?

38 posted on 10/14/2003 6:29:38 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (Only 97 Days until the Iowa Caucuses,,,,, then Iowans will be rid of these DigBats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny; lodwick; Endeavor; BigWaveBetty
I wonder if that peace goddess is that "Gaia" thing we've heard so much about, or if there's more than one. Meanwhile, Dennis shows just how much he trusts the always trustworthy United Nations:

Kucinich said he, unlike Bush, had an exit strategy. The Congressman from Ohio explained how "the U.N. would take charge of all of Iraq's oil reserves, without privatization, and the U.N. would handle all the contracts." Said Kucinich: "No more sweetheart deals for Halliburton. No more war profiteering." source

Oh my, he just offers a little something for everyone (that is, everyone who's as whacked-out as he):

He said he would return to bilateral trade by revoking United States participation in Nafta and the World Trade Organization, repeal the antiterrorism legislation called the USA Patriot Act, create a universal health care system, establish universal prekindergarten schooling and create a cabinet-level Department of Peace that would bring the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s principles of nonviolence into government. ...

The Cleveland event had a tailored multicultural appeal, starting out with prayers from a rabbi, an imam and a Baptist preacher. [I'd like a word or two with the Baptist] The speakers were racially diverse, and Mr. Kucinich took a moment to acknowledge the American Indian communities on Columbus Day.

He also called for a study into whether reparations should be paid for slavery, noting that he has co-sponsored legislation to this effect with Representative John Conyers Jr., Democrat of Michigan. And he spoke on behalf of amnesty and legalization for illegal immigrants. NY Times

Sometimes it's hard to decide who's the nuttiest of the Dem candidates, Braun or Denny.

39 posted on 10/14/2003 6:41:38 PM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Sometimes it's hard to decide who's the nuttiest of the Dem candidates

No wonder the Democrats are depressed and angry. With that stable of candidates, I'd go stark raving mad.

40 posted on 10/14/2003 6:46:58 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (Only 97 Days until the Iowa Caucuses,,,,, then Iowans will be rid of these DigBats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson