To: ER_in_OC,CA
I think Cox would be assured to get the 42% that the brilliant Bill Simon won.
Boxer, like most other California Democrats, seems stuck in the mid to high-40s%.
Whoever we run needs to get started NOW!
Anyone think we should run Arnie now? Or should we wait until 2006? Arnie would clobber Boxer....
13 posted on
11/07/2002 1:32:34 PM PST by
BushRep
To: BushRep
The only reason why California and New Jersey are not joining the Republican national trend is a very poor state organization in each state. There are many Republicans who might as well be Democrats, and then you have crazy ideologues who can't understand that you can't elect a real conservative until you elect moderate Republicans who move the state from liberalism.
We won every state where we have an organization running, regardless of the Democrats.
15 posted on
11/07/2002 1:34:45 PM PST by
BushRep
To: BushRep
I don't like Arnie as a candidate. He's too liberal and too stupid. He would melt on the campaign trail.
To: BushRep
AH-nold sure sounds appealing to me....from what I've observed over the years he seems business smart and likeable.
Of course it could never hurt to have a Kennedy by your side either....gee it might be interesting to see how the Dem's would handle that issue?
His checkered past really can't be an issue in CA can it?
Maybe he could run for Senator and if he loses he could always run for Governor in 2006.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson