Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/30/2026 9:28:26 AM PDT by DFG
A United Nations agency told countries to “strongly discourage” merchant ship crews from acquiring firearms to defend against piracy, despite 90 sailors being held hostage by Somali pirates.
Piracy rose in 2025, according to the annual report from the International Maritime Organization (IMO) released in June, with 171 incidents of successful or attempted attacks on the high seas. However, the agency, tied to the United Nations, took a hard position against potential targets of pirate attacks using firearms to defend themselves, referring to a circular released in June 2015, in a press release issued days after Somali pirates seized an Eritrean oil tanker on August 22.
“For legal and safety reasons, flag States should strongly discourage the carrying and use of firearms by seafarers for personal protection or for the protection of a ship,” the circular said. “Seafarers are civilians and the use of firearms requires special training and aptitudes and the risk of accidents with firearms carried on board ship is great. Carriage of arms on board ships may encourage attackers to carry firearms or even more dangerous weapons, thereby escalating an already dangerous situation. Any firearm on board may itself become an attractive target for an attacker.”
“The use of privately contracted armed security personnel on board ships may lead to an escalation of violence,” the circular adds. “The carriage of such personnel and their weapons is subject to flag State legislation and policies and is a matter for flag States to determine in consultation with shipowners, companies, and ship operators, if and under which conditions this will be allowed. Flag States should take into account the possible escalation of violence which could result from carriage of armed personnel on board merchant ships, when deciding on its policy.”
As of Monday, 90 mariners were being held by Somali pirates alone following the August 22nd seizure of the Eritrean tanker, according to an IMO release. IMO Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez urged countries to follow guidance issued by the agency in the release, referencing the June 2015 circular.
The Strait of Malacca and the waters around Singapore saw the most attacks or attempted attacks, accounting for 122 of the 171 incidents, according to the annual report. The narrow waters, large amount of traffic and the numerous islands, inlets and coastal areas that can provide concealment and escape routes for pirates contributed to the frequency of attacks in that region, according to a Security Outlines report.
The IMO did not respond to a request for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation regarding their recommendations, while the Department of War and Maritime Administration (MARAD) declined to comment.
MARAD referred the DCNF to the United States Coast Guard, which did not respond to a request for comment about whether the recommendations actually make American merchant mariners safer. Some called for allowing crews to be armed, saying it could serve as a deterrent to pirate attacks because pirates would be less likely to target victims due to the possibility of facing armed resistance.
The circular also stated that when going into a port or entering territorial waters, merchant ships were subject to the laws of the country whose port or waters were involved. Some countries, like Australia and Japan, have strict gun control laws.
According to research published by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC), many studies have found that right-to-carry or concealed carry laws are associated with reductions in violent crime by increasing the potential risks faced by offenders. CPRC President John Lott dismissed the circular’s advice.
“It’s the same type of fear mongering that you see being brought up with regard to individual citizens defending themselves,” Lott told the DCNF. “With regard to civilians, you often see the claim in the media that people should behave passively when they’re confronted by a criminal, but that’s really a misreading of the evidence.”
Lott noted that when all forms of active resistance are compared to a passive response, the passive response is safer; however, passive responses poses far more risk for injury than using a firearm for personal defense.
“Women, for example, who behave passively are about 2.4 times more likely to end up being seriously injured. than a woman who has a gun,” Lott said. “Men who behave passively are about 1.4 times more likely to end up being seriously injured than a man who has a gun.”
Lott said the best way to reduce piracy, as with any crime, would be to increase the chances of a negative outcome for the pirates.
“You can make it riskier for criminals with higher arrest rates, higher conviction rates, longer prison sentences, but you can also make it riskier by allowing victims to be able to go and defend themselves,” Lott told the DCNF. “So you’re not even, to the extent that you deter them from attacking to begin with, you don’t even have to worry about whether it will escalate or not because the crime never happens.”
The United States has clashed with piracy since the first decades of its independence. In the early 1800s, the United States used naval power to combat piracy that threatened American commerce, with the most significant conflicts being the First and Second Barbary Wars in the Mediterranean, where pirates seized merchant ships and demanded tribute.
The United States later carried out a similar campaign in the Caribbean and Gulf of America, forming the West Indies Squadron. Since 2000, the United States Navy was involved in multiple engagements with pirates, notably off Somalia in violent incidents that included the 2009 Maersk Alabama hijacking.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The UN Third Worlders have got to go. Human sewage. A tremendous waste of U.S. tax dollars.
What kind of nonsense is this? Sounds like some UN officials are getting a cut of the action.
Skinny Somali piggies are such a waste of ammunition. Use machetes on that solid waste.
It ain’t easy being a pirate, what with armed merchant mariners and stuff.
What I was thinking.
Why would the UN be against ships protecting themselves?
Only one reason I can think of.
This sort of thing won’t stop until our shipping vessels resemble battleships and all staff are at least as armed as the pirates. Being well-armed is an excellent deterrent against crime.
It doesn’t matter what the windbags at the UN say.
What matters are the port rules. Most ports prohibit merchant ships from entering if they are carrying weapons. That’s a sad fact.
And now a question. I wonder how the insurance companies feel about all this. Would they prefer their insured ships to be carrying weapons or not?
Well, the un is kinda anti gun. sorta Except when they help hide weapons for ham-ass and their ilk.
Get the US out of the UN and get the UN the hell out of the US
Well spoken.
The UN is a bunch of homos.
Of course you arm the ships. Or...
You offer an escort service of a different kind:
—When ships approach the Red Sea route and Suez passage, they have a mercenary detachment board their ship with all their equipment.
—Once they pass the danger area, they leave the ship and catch the next vessel heading in the other direction, protecting it: https://constellis.com/
All the risk is transfered to the security contractor regards weapons, training, casualties of their people, etc.
I am quite frankly surprised our security firms like Constellis aren’t all over this.
This would be a great deal for them, our shipping, etc.
What does the UN have to do with anything? If I felt threatened at sea I would damn sure be armed.
Seems to me the violence has already escalated when only the pirates have the guns.
Couldn’t agree more! Get the UnitedNazis out of America now!
Brain Fart:
Could we do a prisoner exchange?
We give the Somalies the International Maritime Organization b’crats in exchange for the sailor?
Double win - sailors home and useless b’crats gone.
You know what the corrupt UN can do
Really, there is no need for a list. Anyone with common sense knows that any commercial vessel should be armed to the teeth. I'm sure there are many more reasons than any list could articulate. It's ridiculous to suggest anything else. Why is the UN still around? Maybe Trump can do something about that in his last year or two. That would be the best thing he could do for the world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.