Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gulf Leaders Didn’t Want the Iran War. They Need Trump to Win It Anyway.
Council on Foreign Relations ^ | March 26, 2026

Posted on 03/26/2026 8:55:30 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

Throughout four weeks of war, Iran has continued to make the United States’ Gulf partners pay a price for Operation Epic Fury and Israel’s Operation Roaring Lion.

The Iranians have fired thousands of missiles and dronesat their neighbors, with the United Arab Emirates (UAE) bearing the brunt of the assault. There is also significant damage to energy infrastructure in Bahrain, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia.

From the first days of the conflict, part of the Islamic Republic’s strategy was immediately clear: inflict significant pain on Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia so that they would in turn pressure the United States (and by extension, Israel) to end the hostilities.

It was a miscalculation. Gulf leaders did not want the war and have privately expressed frustration with the United States and Israel for causing chaos in the region, but they have not pressured President Donald Trump to stop the U.S. attacks. Instead, Saudis, Emiratis, Qataris, and others have closed ranks with each other, signaled that they have a considerable stake in the war’s outcome, and counseled the Trump administration not to end military operations prematurely.

(Excerpt) Read more at cfr.org ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: bahrain; cfr; hormuz; iran; israel; kuwait; operationepicfury; operationroaringlion; qatar; saudiarabia; uae; unitedarabemirates; waronterror

1 posted on 03/26/2026 8:55:30 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
"... expressed frustration with the United States and Israel for causing chaos in the region,..."

And just what do the the Gulf states think all of their
muslim fanatics having been doing in the region
and around the world for the last 70 or so years????

2 posted on 03/26/2026 9:24:54 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

I wouldn’t take the Council of Foreign Relation’s word on what the Gulf states think.

One thing is certain without even asking the Gulf states, they sure as Hades don’t want to live under the threat of a nuclear armed Iran.


3 posted on 03/26/2026 9:46:07 PM PDT by TigersEye (Are the RINOs helping the Democrats wage their color revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The Council on Foreign Relations? Seriously? 🙄


4 posted on 03/26/2026 10:00:59 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

AI Overview. ON THE SOON TO BE IRRELEVANT
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is frequently described as an “elitist” organization because it serves as a nonpartisan, high-level networking hub for a select group of government officials, corporate executives, academics, and media figures who influence U.S. foreign policy. Critics often point to its membership and influence to argue that it promotes a “consensus” favoring globalism, economic neoliberalism, and interventionist foreign policies over national interests.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+1


5 posted on 03/26/2026 10:05:21 PM PDT by jcon40 (Most Leftist and Marxist protesters are really just Unwitting Globalists )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The cost of not defanging The Islamist Republic in Iran would have been
much worse in the near future.


6 posted on 03/27/2026 5:01:00 AM PDT by tennmountainman ( (“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRobr 12-2-2023 DITTO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

But they sat idly by while Iran attacked Israel. Israel responds and they act all surprised.


7 posted on 03/27/2026 5:02:20 AM PDT by AppyPappy (They don't call you a Nazi because they think you are one. They do it to justify violence. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Bkmk


8 posted on 03/27/2026 5:55:04 AM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

They wanted it. They’re lying. It’s one of those things you don’t say out loud.

Those nations were attacked because they host our military bases. All of those nations would prefer we not be there but the presence of oil forces them to deal with 2 devils.


9 posted on 03/27/2026 5:55:07 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Council on Foreign Relations? You are grabbing any leftist sh*t you can find to post here. What’s next? Bulwark?, Mother Jones? The View? You have become an insufferable ayatollah fluffer


10 posted on 03/27/2026 8:28:54 AM PDT by pissant ((Deport them all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Uh, none of “those nations” rulers / elites would likely be in power or anywhere near so wealthy if it was not for oil (or some equivalent.)

The oil makes them wealthy and then the ruling class uses a large chunk of their wealth to buy off or fend off the radicals. (In 2015, 2017, and 2020, Saudi Arabia was the 3rd largest spender on defense in the world. After 2015, they didn’t drop under #5 until 2025, per some sources.) (2025 followed their “detente” with Iran in 2024.)

These countries spend considerably more to, essentially, buy off and / or distract even more of their populations.

It’s all funded by oil.


11 posted on 03/27/2026 7:14:15 PM PDT by Paul R. (Old Viking saying: "Never be more than 3 steps away from your weapon ... or a Uriah Heep song!" ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.

They can only do so much to fend off the radicals. They wanted Bill Clinton to take care of Bin Laden. 3000 lost lives later he was finally taken out. It was suggested that if there was an election over there Bin Laden would have won it. Sounds like a pressure cooker where they have to keep the lid on.


12 posted on 03/27/2026 7:58:54 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

I would agree with almost all of that! :-(


13 posted on 03/27/2026 11:16:59 PM PDT by Paul R. (Old Viking saying: "Never be more than 3 steps away from your weapon ... or a Uriah Heep song!" ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson