Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I still don’t see a problem with less people on earth.

America doesn’t need 400 million people. It doesn’t need 300 million people.

America had 200 million people in 1970. What is wrong with going back to that?

I clearly understand that economically we have all kinds of systems that are akin to ponzi schemes where economic growth depends on an ever-increasing population. Tough nuts. We are due for some belt tightening and reduced materialism.

I don’t mind seeing America return to a population of 200 million.


12 posted on 11/18/2025 1:40:12 AM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

“America had 200 million people in 1970. What is wrong with going back to that?”
.
Nothing, but Mohammedism is the Future.

‘Glad I’m old...


14 posted on 11/18/2025 1:49:29 AM PST by Does so (☞GOP should fund a new party. Call it the "Muslim Party", to track it.....Dem☭¢rat ∅ ™ ½¼)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
I don’t mind seeing America return to a population of 200 million.

I wouldn't either. However, the bigger issue is that because of the demographics changes we've seen over the last few decades most of them won't be American.

15 posted on 11/18/2025 2:49:39 AM PST by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

RE: America doesn’t need 400 million people. It doesn’t need 300 million people.

The issue is more complicated than that— the average age of the develop country’s population is AGING, and with that AGED CARE becomes an important factor in society. Like it or not, as the population ages, health conditions associated with aging affects a significant portion of the population.

If we do not have enough young people to take care of our aged as their health deteriorates, we’ll have to either consider using technology ( AI and Robots ) to do the job, import younger care givers from country with surplus population, or in the most amoral case ( as they’re already doing in Canada for instance), develop ways to make them die comfortably before their time ( this also means you and me eventually ).

And not only that, as the population ages, assuming they’re even healthy, they’re all mostly retired, and depending on pensions and social security for living. Unfortunately, our system is such that the retired are dependent on the currently working to prop up the system. If we do not have enough able bodied WORKING younger folks to help carry this system, then yes, the country will eventually be screwed.

We need a growing productive population to replenish and replace those who will pass on, that’s the bottom line.


21 posted on 11/18/2025 6:11:40 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson