Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.S. Air Force Needs Hundreds of Boeing F-47 ‘NGAD’ Fighters
National Security Journal ^ | 8/25/2025 | Kris Osborn

Posted on 08/25/2025 11:07:42 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: whyilovetexas111

Taiwan can afford to buy a lot of F-35s.


41 posted on 08/25/2025 2:50:16 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Nukes baby. Make it clear we will use them if we need to.


42 posted on 08/25/2025 3:00:45 PM PDT by Racketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51
One clarification: We do not have a treaty obligation to come to the defense of Taiwan in the event it is attacked.

The US withdrew from the treaty formally (and unilaterally) in 1980 (Carter, of course).

Under the conditions of the current Taiwan Relations Act, the decision about the nature and quantity of defense services that America will provide to Taiwan is to be determined by the President and Congress.

However we have left open the option of intervention. I suppose the level of involvement there would be determined by what PRC does in terms of military action directly involving US assets.

43 posted on 08/25/2025 3:31:29 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Boeing f-47. Price per plane current estimation of $300m.

Instead imagine building 1,000 low tech drone and some manned aircraft of many kinds, with a *price tag limit* of $300,000 each.

Same cost. Who is going to win the fight? 1,000 to 1.

War has long been a balance between high quality and large numbers for a long time. If a military becomes too imbalanced in either direction, it becomes vulnerable.


44 posted on 08/25/2025 4:02:06 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (If you see "Acheta" protein in a product, know that it has been adulterated with insect protein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
The B-47 was a widow maker due to structural deficiencies.

And with some very unforgiving flight characteristics that kept people constantly on their toes even when things were going well. Bad combo.

As a little kid with a dad who had been in the Korean War-era USAF, I was fascinated by the B-47, which for some reason I thought was the best looking airplane yet.

The F-47 reminds me of some arrowheads I used to find along the river... and not pretty arrowheads, either.

45 posted on 08/25/2025 5:01:01 PM PDT by niteowl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

As if China can materially threaten mainland US.


46 posted on 08/25/2025 6:29:54 PM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51
Wait, please first explain scenarios where it would be either reasonable or unavoidable that the USA gets into a shooting war with China.

The Mongolian Thrust would be one scenario.



47 posted on 08/25/2025 7:21:28 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: niteowl77

The B-47 had classic good looks — and a tendency to crash. About ten percent of them were lost, some 203 aircraft crashes. As for the F-47, only an aviation engineer could think it good looking. I have no doubt though that its performance will be exceptional.


48 posted on 08/25/2025 7:34:48 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

A cheaper solution would to give Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea intermediate range missiles under joint control armed with our most advanced nuclear warhead the W87. Below is from Wiki.

“The original yield of the W87 was 300 kilotons, but it has the announced ability to be upgraded to a yield of 475 kilotons, presumably by using more highly enriched uranium (HEU) in the fusion secondary stage tamper. It is not known if that upgrade was completely tested and ready to implement, or merely designed.[4]”

China could defeat Japan, Korea, and Taiwan in war. If these nations were armed with nukes the price would be unbearable to China. War would not happen.


49 posted on 08/25/2025 9:14:40 PM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Again, can we afford it?


“No bucks, No Buck Rogers”....


50 posted on 08/25/2025 9:35:50 PM PDT by AFret. (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

Raytheon, Boeing, the Pentagon.... one big buddy system composed of corrupt politicians and even worse contractors. F*** the bs National Security Journal.


51 posted on 08/25/2025 9:46:06 PM PDT by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson