Maybe dayglored is Wiki editor...who knows?
Wow. I'm not disputing that.
> Maybe dayglored is Wiki editor...who knows?
LOL, hardly. Their editors are maniacal and mostly leftist. I wouldn't fit in at all, nor would I have any inclination to do so.
I contributed a couple of brief articles on the American's Creed and William Tyler Page, many many years ago. I also contributed an article on "Sodom Road" in Ithaca, NY with a history going back to when Ithaca was known as Sodom (for the obvious reason). It first got absorbed into the article on Ithaca, NY, and then the righteous folks in Ithaca had it removed, despite the fact that it was sourced from the town historian. Oh well.
Wikipedia's political stance is leftist, and untrustworthy. They are hard into the woke BS as well.
However, the site is pretty good for non-political, non-woke-prone topics. Hard data is not political or social. Objective reality is undeniable, and Wikipedia has a lot of that, which makes it useful for those things.