No Government Investigation of Obama Birth Certificate

The Post Email Newspaper ^ | 22 Aug 2022 | Tom Arnold

[CDR Kerchner]

... The “problem” with this is that forensic document experts have determined that the Hawaiian “Birth Certificate” of Obama is an amateurish forgery. It is a pieced-together computer-generated document for which the identity of another person born in Honolulu on or about the same date (August 4, 1961) was used, constituting the crimes of Identity Theft and Forgery. I URGE THAT EVERYONE WHO HAS AN INTEREST IN LAW AND ORDER AND OUR U.S. CONSTITUTION SHOULD READ THIS EXCELLENT ARTICLE WHICH APPARENTLY IS BEING REJECTED BY THE FBI AS A FOIA REQUEST. ... continue reading at: https://www.thepostemail.com/2025/08/22/no-government-investigation-of-obama-birth-certificate/

---

TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: forgeddocuments; fraud; obama; usurper

[Joe Boucher]

Good
Use the FBI to investigate obammy’s birth
And while at it check if big mike has a weiner

[CDR Kerchner]

They took down Sheriff Arpaio’s webpage on the subject after he was out of office. But you can read a lot of the investigation reports here: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/?s=Sheriff+Arpaio

[JohnnyP]

Be gone. She’s earned her place here.

[dandiegirl]

O himself wrote that he was born in Kenya when he wrote that little blurb about himself for something at Harvard I believe.

[Dixie Yooper]

Convict him of treason first, then prove that he never should have been a candidate. We have bigger fish to fry than Red Herring.

[Chewbarkah]

Back when Obama was vying with Hillary Clinton for the Dem nomination, there seemed to have been a coordinated effort to seek and destroy documents related to Obama’s birth.

1) “May 22, 2208: Snooping State Department contractors broke into the private passport files of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain, prompting concern over government security and whether political dirty tricks were afoot.” So WHO, you may ask, ran the company these rogue snoops worked for? JOHN BRENNAN.

Per CNN: “The CEO of a company whose employee is accused of improperly looking at the passport files of presidential candidates is a consultant to the Barack Obama campaign, a source said Saturday. John O. Brennan, president and CEO of the Analysis Corp., advises the Illinois Democrat on foreign policy and intelligence issues, the source said.”

Was this a CIA-style operation to expunge the files of Obama passport applications, birth certificates, visas, etc., while throwing in the other candidates to divert attention? Uh, yes.

2) The Divorce Decree for Obama Sr and the Obamamama was found in Maui court records. That doc refers to a fourth page (might be a fifth, it’s been a while...) with info about their child. Oops...that page was missing.

So don’t hold your breath waiting for Obama’s records to surface.

[faucetman]

” he was a son of US mother, so he was eligible for presidency.””

Ah, NO!

Natural Born Citizen (REQUIRED for President and Vice President)

Born ON U.S. soil by 2 (TWO) citizen parentS.

The understood meaning of “Natural Born Citizen” at the time by framers and founders per Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations.

Book 1, 212 states:

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

Parents, with an “S” as in Plural as in TWO/BOTH.

[miniTAX]

“She’s earned her place here”

---

if that means anything (according to you only), it’s all the more reason for her to show a modicum of consideration to others by not stuffing EVERY of her posts with deliberate typos.
Defending bad behavior and claiming entitlement, you want to play the closet leftist retard or what?

[CDR Kerchner]

Yes, indeed. Obama himself was the original “birther” and Hillary was the second in line: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2023/05/24/who-was-the-original-birther-it-was-barack-hussein-obama-ii-himself/ ... and ... https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2015/07/02/hillary-clinton-the-first-birther-not-quite-barack-obama-was/ ... and ... https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2016/09/09/flashback-early-birther-chris-matthews-in-dec-2007-aired-on-msnbc-the-clinton-operatives-talk-about-obama-born-in-indonesia-and-obamas-islamic-background/

[RideForever]

he was a son of US mother,

She was under-aged to marry at his birth, IIRC ... so question she could confer citizenship arises ...

[goo goo g'joob]

Only when some "journalist" decides to INVESTIGATE the matter and dig out the TRUTH.

The journalist has to be honest and follow the facts wherever they lead.

incurious

Yes, incurious is a proper word in the English language. It is an adjective meaning "not curious; lacking interest or inquisitiveness." It describes someone or something that shows a lack of curiosity or desire to learn or explore.

[CDR Kerchner]

Correct. For more on “natural born Citizen”, a clear cut “Natural Law” term, that the 20th century progressive movement has attempted to bastardize for decades as to the true meaning of it, and how and why it was put in and used in our U.S. Constitution by the founders and framers, see: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/naturalborncitizen/TheWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyandHowofNBC-WhitePaper.pdf ... and ... http://kerchner.com/protectourliberty/Article2SuperPACeligibilityfacts-issuespage.pdf

[Political Junkie Too]

If anyone is interested in the true history of the question of Barack Obama's birth certificate, let me show you a documented history of this issue. As you will see:

1. It was NOT created by Donald Trump.
2. It was started by the Hillary Clinton campaign, though indirectly.
3. It was really started by Politifact, a fact-checking outfit initially a part of the St. Petersburg Times (Florida) as they attempted to debunk the Hillary Clinton campaign's smear attack.

Here is the evidential proof.

1. November 21, 2007: Clinton campaign Iowa volunteer Judy Rose (volunteer county chair) forwarded an anonymous chain email that had been circulating claiming that Obama was secretly Muslim and that his middle name was “Muhammad” to eight fellow Democrats, including a paid campaign staffer, Ryan Callanan.

   See Politifact's later explanation on this from September 25, 2015: The Obama Muslim Myth: The Clinton connection.

   In the fall of 2007, it was clear that Clinton was losing ground in Iowa. The presumptive front runner was vulnerable and people in the campaign knew it. On Dec. 5, 2007, the online magazine Politico posted the text of an email that had been forwarded by Judy Rose, the volunteer chair of the Clinton campaign in Jones County Iowa on Nov. 21, 2007. The email was a quintessential smear that offered a distorted biography of Obama’s early years. Rose offered no commentary on it. She simply passed it along.

   "Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim," the email said, and it ended with, "The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the U.S. from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States , one of their own!!!!"

   Rose, sent this to eight of her fellow Democrats. One of them was Clinton campaign staffer Ryan Callanan who replied to the email on the same day in November.

   "I’ve gotten this forward before," Callanan wrote. "It’s racist and ignorant. I can’t believe that people believe this stuff."

2. December 5 or 6, 2007: The forwarded emails became public and the Clinton campaign terminated the volunteers, saying that the emails were "wholly unauthorized" and that the campaign was "totally unaware of it."

   The public airing of the email brought a quick reaction from the Clinton campaign. On Dec. 6, 2007, the Associated Press reported that Rose had resigned as chair of her county committee.

   "There is no place in our campaign, or any campaign, for this kind of politics," Clinton campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle said. "A volunteer county coordinator made the mistake of forwarding an outrageous and offensive chain e-mail. This was wholly unauthorized and we were totally unaware of it."

   A few days later, a second volunteer in a different county stepped down when it was learned that she had forwarded a similar email in October.

   These are the only two instances where Clinton campaign volunteers, much less staff, are known to have spread the false story about Obama’s religion.

3. March 5, 2008: "Velvet Hammer," an anonymous blogger posts the following: Wanted: Barack Hussein Obama’s Birth Certificate:

   Excerpt:

   My inquiring mind wants to know. Has anyone seen Obama’s birth certificate? Just to ease my curious mind, I would like to see it.

   Should his birth certificate be in the public domain? Or not? I do not have a clue.

4. April 18, 2008: Politifact attempts to debunk to debunk the chain email rumor that has gained traction and was sent in by readers for evaluation. In their fact-check, Politifact matter-of-factly states that the Obama campaign declinded to provide a copy of his birth certificate: No Muhammed or Mohammed in Obama's name

   Excerpt:

   A chain e-mail that originates with a letter from American missionaries working in Kenya warns about Sen. Barack Obama's ties to Kenya and its opposition party, encouraging readers "not to be taken in by those that are promoting him."

   Among the many allegations is one about Obama's name: "By the way. His true name is Barak Hussein Muhammed Obama. Won't that sound sweet to our enemies as they swear him in on the Koran! God bless you."

   [snip]

   Let's be clear: The senator from Illinois who is running for president of the United States is named Barack Hussein Obama Jr. His campaign has insisted that is his full name (no Muhammad). We've checked this before and found it to be blatantly wrong. But since the rumor persists, we decided to dig deeper.

   We have now searched every public record we can access and find nothing to support the notion that Obama has a second middle name of "Muhammed" or "Mohammed." Only in the ether of chain e-mails does this allegation fly.

   We have a copy of Obama's marriage certificate from the Cook County Bureau of Vital Statistics in Illinois. Barack H. Obama married Michelle L. Robinson on Oct. 3, 1992, in Chicago. (And, yes, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. officiated.)

   We looked at Obama's driver's license record in the state of Illinois, and the name reads: Barack H Obama. (Senator, just a reminder that your license is up for renewal this year).

   We searched property records for Obama and found listings under the names Barack Hussein Obama and Barack H Obama.

   We also found Obama's registration and disciplinary record with the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois. ( You can see it here. ) Barack Hussein Obama was admitted as a lawyer by the Illinois Supreme Court on Dec. 17, 1991. (By the way, Obama has no public record of discipline.)

   We tried to obtain a copy of Obama's birth certificate, but his campaign would not release it and the state of Hawaii does not make such records public.

   This was the spark that lit the fuse.

5. June 9, 2008: Jim Geraghty of National Review picks up on the remark by Politifact and reports it on his blog: Obama Could Debunk Some Rumors By Releasing His Birth Certificate.

   Excerpt:

   Having done some Obama-rumor debunking that got praise from Daily Kos (a sign of the apocalypse, no doubt), perhaps the Obama campaign could return the favor and help debunk a bunch of others with a simple step: Could they release a copy of his birth certificate?

   Reporters have asked for it and been denied, and the state of Hawaii does not make such records public.

6. June 10, 2008: Conservative journalist and blogger Michelle Malkin picks up on Geraghty's NRO blog post and amplifies it to her wider audience: The buzz about Barack’s birth certificate

   Excerpt:

   Jim Geraghty takes a look at longstanding blog buzz over Barack Obama’s birth certificate, which the campaign refused to release to the St. Petersburg Times in April:

   We tried to obtain a copy of Obama’s birth certificate, but his campaign would not release it and the state of Hawaii does not make such records public.

   Has anyone seen it? Why shouldn’t the record be in the public domain for presidential candidates?

   Geraghty walks through various rumors now circulating in the wake of the Obama campaign’s birth certificate blackout...

7. June 12, 2008: The Barack Obama campaign releases a certificate of live birth to their "Fight The Smears" website and gives "The Daily Kos" website exclusive access to it.

tl;dr - It wasn't conservatives that started the "birther" rumor, it was Politifact and Obama himself when the Politifact reported that the Obama campaign refused to make public his birth certificate over what appeared to be a simple innocuous request to debunk rumors.

In the information vaccuum create by Politifact and the Obama campaign, the internet swooped in to fill the void.

-PJ

[CDR Kerchner]

An important event in the very early time line was when Chris Matthews on 18 Dec 2007 discussed the Clinton operatives spreading information that Obama was born in Indonesia and had Muslim roots. See this article for moe details on that: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2016/09/09/flashback-early-birther-chris-matthews-in-dec-2007-aired-on-msnbc-the-clinton-operatives-talk-about-obama-born-in-indonesia-and-obamas-islamic-background/

[butterdezillion]

Thank you. My phone is really hard to work with. Takes a lot of time to correct typos because it often doesn’t accept my finger touches. And i was in a hurry to post before the whole thread was filled with, “At this point what difference does it make?” (And yes, I still think Benghazi matters because it’s one more piece of the whole conspiracy. So was Extortion 17, which had to appease the Muslim world after acknowledging that Bin Laden was dead - whuch was used to distract from the fake BC. It’s all tied together. Montgomery’s work for Clapper and Brennan ties into the altered HDOH database but also the voter registration manipulation which enabled the 2020 election theft. When people connect all the dots there is a clear image of the planned 16 year coup. That’s what I wanted to point out before the typical collective yawn on these threads.

So i was in a hurry, unwilling to take 15 min correcting typos on each post. I guess that makes me a jerk.

I need to put my research findings into a more concise form on my blog. They killed my husband so I wouldn’t have time to do that, and it was very effective.

But the more I see on these threads, the more I fear we don’t have the will, commitment, discernment, and discipline to ever really deal with this so why even try to point out that the hdoh has already admitted there’s no valid HI bc for Obama and so both bc’s for him are confirmed as forgeries? Nobody seems to care. What they do care about is the rudeness of typos.

I hope the Trump team cares, and excises the whole cancer that is killing our country and any chance of unity. That would require exposing the WHOLE coup from beginning to end.

[dljordan]

What about his SSN?

[dljordan]

Be a natural-born citizen of the United States
Be at least 35 years old
Have been a resident of the United States for 14 years

A natural born citizen is a person who is a U.S. citizen at birth, typically defined as someone born on U.S. soil or to U.S. citizen parents. This status is important for eligibility to run for President of the United States, as specified in the Constitution.

[butterdezillion]

All lack of investigation can be justified by the “presumptuon of regularity”. And that’s because the focus was on what Obama himself faked, instead of the evidence that THE GOVERNMENT was falsifying records.

The day after i was put into contact with Terry Lakin’s legal team to share my evidence that would impeach the presumption of regularity (by showing the birth index list contained names from non-valid bc’s) my computer was hit with a massive trojan. The next day the sheathing on the wiring of my husband’s van was removed causing sparking that could have blown up the van. I think it was a couple weeks later that Judge Denise Lind ruled that foreign combat authorized by the AUF that gave sole discretion to the CINC didn’t require approval by a Constitutional CINC. We don’t need no steenkin’ CINC so the question of whether Lakin’s orders were authorized by a Constitutional CINC was moot.

The Deep State knew that if the evidence of HDOH fabrication was allowed to be presented in a legal setting the original records would have to be given to Lakin for discovery. So they had to massacre the whole meaning of the Authorization to Use Force.

Outside of a legal setting, the FBI can ignore whatever they want. But you can bwt tour bottom dollar that Brennan knew about my contact wirh Lakin’s team and that the SecDef told Lind what ahe had to do.

Lind should be waterboarded until she gives up the details of how she was to carry out that part of the seditious conspiracy. And Lakin should receive the highest honor and backpay.

[Mr. K]

I remember when Sheriff Apollo and the Posse he had created to look into this held a press conference to announce their findings that it was absolutely 100% of forgery, and they found the source documents.

The first question from the reporters was how much time did you waste doing this?

Not one single reporter asked or reported on the fact that Obama’s birth certificate was a proven forgery

[butterdezillion]

Did you mean “every ONE of her posts”? If so, you left out a word. But that’s OK. I’m not going to go into volatile road rage over piddles like that.

And neither will JohnnyP, because he majors in the majors. You should try it sometime.

My phone is notoriously bad at not accepting my finger touches. At my old job I had customers watch me spend about a minute just trying to get the phone to recognize one of my finger touches. It takes a long time to correct mistakes, and when I’m in a hurry sometimes I don’t take that time. I think I had two posts here that I didn’t take the time. When I’m typing on my computer, as I am now, I correct any mistakes I see. That is my normal, and JohnnyP has enough experience with me that he knows that.

I apologize for any typos. I allowed them this time for the sake of a higher priority but they were not deliberate. I’m sorry that I made it frustrating for you to read my posts.

You made false accusations against a good poster who is also a wise and kind man. IMHO, you owe JohnnyP an apology.