Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Peter ODonnell

Nobody wants Canada’s problems.


3 posted on 08/18/2025 12:54:45 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 1Old Pro
Nobody wants Canada’s problems.

And we sure don’t want their electoral votes.

9 posted on 08/18/2025 12:58:02 PM PDT by Allegra (Thank you for your attention to this matter. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 1Old Pro; AppyPappy

Carney’s an idiot and his voters even more idiotic. Canada = Another California. Oh, the dems would LOVE to have Canada.

I’m surprised that Carney doesn’t know that Puerto Rico is known as the unofficial 51st US state.


19 posted on 08/18/2025 1:02:30 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 1Old Pro

“No one wants Canada’s problems.”

Probably not, but I am convinced powerful forces in Washington DC want Canada’s resources, and have already launched a Soros-imitating color revolution of the alt right to achieve that goal. They are not stating it openly, but in code, just as Putin stated in code what he wanted — under a ridiculous pretext that Nazis were in power — but really he wanted the resources of eastern Ukraine. And now he has them. On FR there is quite a strong contingent of people who state Putin has every right to annex not just eastern Ukraine but all of Ukraine. This speaks to a new reality, a “big power” complex that says, big powers have rights to lord it over smaller countries, taking them over if they wish. The extension of this attitude is disturbing. Why should China therefore not have the right to take over Taiwan, or other Asian territory if they so wish? What are the limits on Russian expansion? Who else gets into the big power club? Would Brazil have carte blanche to invade its neighbors? If the UK play nice with DC, can they get back in (they were of course of this mind-set before 1939). Or France? Israel? Saudi Arabia?

And where do Americans stand on this, is it a natural part of the MAGA movement, is it opposed in principle to it and a return to a neo-con agenda, what is it really? What prevents a different emphasis and a planned ignoring of the think tanks and power centers of which I speak (and make no mistake, almost nobody in the mainstream of MAGA or FR membership has any standing with those people, they are what Paul Simon called a loose coalition of millionaires and billionaires — any billionaires on FR today?)


21 posted on 08/18/2025 1:03:06 PM PDT by Peter ODonnell (Don't be fooled or surprised by the new form of color revolution as ideologues try to annex Canada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 1Old Pro
Nobody wants Canada’s problems.

Including The Crown, who might try to unload it onto the ungrateful Colonials.

76 posted on 08/18/2025 1:46:21 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson