“No one wants Canada’s problems.”
Probably not, but I am convinced powerful forces in Washington DC want Canada’s resources, and have already launched a Soros-imitating color revolution of the alt right to achieve that goal. They are not stating it openly, but in code, just as Putin stated in code what he wanted — under a ridiculous pretext that Nazis were in power — but really he wanted the resources of eastern Ukraine. And now he has them. On FR there is quite a strong contingent of people who state Putin has every right to annex not just eastern Ukraine but all of Ukraine. This speaks to a new reality, a “big power” complex that says, big powers have rights to lord it over smaller countries, taking them over if they wish. The extension of this attitude is disturbing. Why should China therefore not have the right to take over Taiwan, or other Asian territory if they so wish? What are the limits on Russian expansion? Who else gets into the big power club? Would Brazil have carte blanche to invade its neighbors? If the UK play nice with DC, can they get back in (they were of course of this mind-set before 1939). Or France? Israel? Saudi Arabia?
And where do Americans stand on this, is it a natural part of the MAGA movement, is it opposed in principle to it and a return to a neo-con agenda, what is it really? What prevents a different emphasis and a planned ignoring of the think tanks and power centers of which I speak (and make no mistake, almost nobody in the mainstream of MAGA or FR membership has any standing with those people, they are what Paul Simon called a loose coalition of millionaires and billionaires — any billionaires on FR today?)
Note carefully, I said there was a plan, not that you as FR members were in on it or supported it. Read my tagline.
I agree 100% with the basic premises of the MAGA movement. The problem is, the power structure in Washington DC is free to pursue whatever agenda they wish, and some of it may not be what you voted for. At the very least, we need to be vigilant that MAGA is not used as a premise to enable a different agenda, and its supporters fobbed off by partial returns (5% of illegals deported, tariffs, dissing Canada etc).
What’s really going on? Is the outcome going to be totally better than globalism, or just a sly return to pre-globalist neo-con American imperialism? A lot of people might like that. It’s natural to think one’s country is better than all the rest. In all cases it is not accurate, the only superior nation is the Kingdom of God.