We have a ringside seat for civilization collapse.
The idiots of modern education don’t care if the students actually learn anything. Furthermore, they permit complaints from those who don’t want to learn to frustrate the learning of the students who do. The “experts” with the education degrees are largely educated idiots.
There is huge variation in quality of the sage on the stage. Go watch a few Richard Feynman Physics lectures for an example of what a high quality teacher looks like.
What is needed is a reversal of the classroom / homework schema.
For homework, the student watches high quality lectures a la Feynman.
In class, you have a lesser sage able to answer questions about the material and help students through the rough parts / areas where the student is having trouble.
Do the students actually listen? I think a lot of it depends on the subject matter too. I certainly wouldn’t want my mechanic to learn entirely via lecture, guide on the side is definitely the way to teach a lot of stuff. The problem is, as always, trying to go one size fits all, it’s a great Zappa album but a crappy way to do pretty much everything.
We went on to have a good discussion about income distribution and policies. Thinking that students can self-direct a classroom is stupid and just an extension of the participation trophy mentality that is designed to fool students that they are learning something via a classroom free-for-all. You need teachers who draws students into the conversation, not put them in charge of it.
not a “sage on the stage” but a “guide on the side.”
Does everything have to rhyme all the time? Guess it’s the only way to glean what you mean.
A lot of people get away with writing articles to justify the fact that they don’t really know anything.