Oh no! [ Insert “Mr. Bill” picture ] ... industrial activity causes global warming. Did somebody get the memo out to China?
Some scientists cough cough..have put co2 in a tiny little box....separate from the workings of the Universe itself....and only subject to the “inventions” by man. The entire concept is absurd...
/
AKA
Secular humanist messiah complex psychosis .
They all think the are saviors
( Pride, the first and foundational sin )
That's what happens when one rejects the true Messiah
Jesus Christ.
One becomes their own god
( The 1st lie, “ you shall be as gods ")
False premise. CO2 is reactionary, an effect, not a driver. Discredits the rest.
Atmospheric CO2 is a RESULT of climate, not a CAUSE of climate change. Warmer climate, more plants; more plants, more CO2.
Dr. Spencer is one of the few climate scientists who isn’t owned by the deep state.
[[Yes, Increasing CO2 Causes a Warming Tendency in the Climate System… So What? ]]
Bzzt- Wrong- Warming periods cause rises in CO2- hundreds of years LATER- Ice core samples prove that warming happens first, then CO2 levels rise- the exact opposite of what the hoaxers claim!
New blockbuster paper finds man-made CO2 is not the driver of global warming
“The highlights of the paper are:
► The overall global temperature change sequence of events appears to be from 1) the ocean surface to 2) the land surface to 3) the lower troposphere.
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature.
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5-10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature.
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature.
► Changes in ocean temperatures appear to explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980.
► CO2 released from use of fossil fuels have little influence on the observed changes in the amount of atmospheric CO2, and changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.”
I don’t know if it was totally planned from the start, or just fell into place, but the results of government declared climate crises has been more government control, less individual freedoms and more costly energy for everyone.
This is the main reason I oppose it. The government (elite individuals at the top of the food chain) wants the power...
What won’t it do (lie, cheat, steal) to keep on acquiring power over the people?