Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger
I am confused. If someone is a light-skinned black, are they not also a dark-skinned white person? These references to “white” and “black” need to be directed into something more productive. Maybe just saying “melanin content around 50%” should be the norm. Saying “mixed-race” could mean Japanese and English, about as white-looking as one can get and be that.

How can the police best describe a suspect they are looking for? I'd say physical features like “narrow” or “wide” nose should be said. “Straight” or “curly” hair. They could take a shot at likely genetic heritage, as in “prominent English” or “prominent mid-African” features, to bolster it. For other possible color influences, “red-toned” or “yellow-toned” skin would enhance American Indian or Chinese features.

For many Americans, the first term might be “heavy” or “fat,” anymore, though.

7 posted on 07/29/2025 8:03:15 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind

I’d go with Sub-Saharan’...............


8 posted on 07/29/2025 8:05:16 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson