Skip to comments.
JUST IN: Obama Judge Blocks Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order in Third Ruling Since Supreme Court Decision Restricting Nationwide Injunctions
Gateway Pundit ^
| July 25, 2025
| Cristina Laila
Posted on 07/25/2025 3:43:09 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: Macho MAGA Man
this isn’t “just in”: it happened yesterday and numerous posts were made here about it then ...
41
posted on
07/25/2025 4:42:04 PM PDT
by
catnipman
((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
To: Macho MAGA Man
They’re like spoiled brats.
Never having been told *No* they just continue figuring they’ll outlast and wear out their opponent.
They need to be dealt with, removed from position if possible for refusing to follow the USSC ruling.
42
posted on
07/25/2025 4:47:30 PM PDT
by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
To: Sacajaweau
The census counts persons.
Illegals are persons.
Just stop it.
43
posted on
07/25/2025 4:48:04 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: telescope115
Enough already! If the judges are going to ignore Supreme Court rulings, then Trump just needs to ignore the idiot judges! Let the judges CHOKE on their illegal rulings. They’re making fools out of the administration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...
The administration should refuse to comply with any lower court judgements that are not in compliance with Supreme Court decisions.
44
posted on
07/25/2025 4:48:30 PM PDT
by
fortes fortuna juvat
(President Trump is America's long-awaited SUPREME Commander in Chief. Deus Hoc Vult!)
To: Jim Noble
45
posted on
07/25/2025 4:49:26 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
To: telescope115
Yeah, I don’t get it. Trump should simply declare that based on the Supremes rulings those orders don’t apply.
46
posted on
07/25/2025 4:49:58 PM PDT
by
aquila48
(Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they. control you. )
To: Fledermaus
“Citizens not persons”
The Constitution specifies “persons” for counting in the census.
47
posted on
07/25/2025 4:51:31 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: Macho MAGA Man
48
posted on
07/25/2025 4:53:12 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
( The Blob must be bled dry sbut don’t hold your breath have her)
To: Jim Noble
Back then it meant citizens. Remember the 3/5 fight?
Read the supporting writings.
It’s like those that ignore under the jurisdiction thereof.
Regards
49
posted on
07/25/2025 4:55:06 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
To: metmom
“ removed from position if possible for refusing to follow the USSC ruling.”
They ARE following the USSC ruling.
District courts are allowed to issue national injunctions when dealing with a class action. That is EXACTLY what the USSC said in the recent decision everyone here is misquoting.
50
posted on
07/25/2025 4:55:48 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: Jim Noble
Amendment XIV mandates birthright citizenship by any reasonable a mindless interpretation
To: Fledermaus
Slaves were counted as persons.
52
posted on
07/25/2025 5:00:11 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: Macho MAGA Man
I disagree with the decision, but since several states were the ones bringing suit the nationwide injunction is legit and does not violate the Supreme Court’s order.
53
posted on
07/25/2025 5:01:00 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: Revel
54
posted on
07/25/2025 5:01:21 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: Jim Noble
55
posted on
07/25/2025 5:02:11 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
To: frank ballenger
Nope. The suit was brought by several states which meets the exception for the ban on nationwide exemptions.
56
posted on
07/25/2025 5:02:22 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: cross_bearer_02
They did not ban nationwide injunctions in any and all cases.
57
posted on
07/25/2025 5:03:52 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: Fledermaus
“Under the jurisdiction” is not what it says.
It says, “SUBJECT TO the jurisdiction”
58
posted on
07/25/2025 5:05:22 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: Fledermaus
The 3/5 limitation was to reduce Southern representation in the House, and it is applied to PERSONS held to a term of service.
59
posted on
07/25/2025 5:08:45 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: Uversabound
Your parents are to be commended!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson