These bureaucrats need to go after this company because the same argument by the moving company can be used by police and fire departments.
Posted on 07/21/2025 8:24:58 AM PDT by DFG
Is it unfair if a company that specializes in picking up and transporting heavy loads emphasizes hiring younger people over employing senior citizens? That's the federal government's position in the case of Meathead Movers, a California business that bills itself as offering "athlete movers" who are "clean-cut, strong, and professionally-trained." The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has spent years investigating the company for age discrimination and even filed a rare agency-initiated lawsuit against the company with no individual plaintiff claiming harm. Now, Arizona's Goldwater Institute is suing the EEOC to find out what's behind the federal bureaucracy's anti-meathead jihad.
Why Would You Prefer Strong, Young Movers?
"The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed suit against the San Luis Obispo moving company Meathead Movers, Inc., the largest independent moving company in California, for refusing to hire people based on age," the federal bureaucracy boasted in September of 2023. "The EEOC's lawsuit charges that since at least 2017, Meathead Movers failed to recruit and hire applicants over 40 into moving, packing and customer service positions. Meathead maintains a pattern or practice of recruiting and hiring young college students, intentionally excluding older workers regardless of their individual abilities."
Founded in 1997 by two then-high school athletes, Aaron and Evan Steed, the company has grown into California's largest independent moving company based on the what the company describes as "the brothers' vision of energetic athletes delivering a unique customer service experience."
A 2017 profile in Inc. magazine described the company's evolution into not just a larger and more successful moving company, but a launch pad for young athletes. Meathead Movers "hires student athletes with ambitious career goals and helps them achieve those goals through coaching, training, and confidence building. When employees start their postgraduation job searches, founder Aaron Steed proactively calls hiring managers to sing their praises." To that end, the profile added, "the business recruits its 350-plus movers–mostly wrestlers, as well as football and baseball players–from colleges in southern and central California."
The approach has fans. This year, Pacific Coast Business Times surveyed 1,400 employees at almost 100 companies and named Meathead Movers among the "2025 Central Coast Best Places to Work."
This means the company's founders built a growing moving business that's popular among its employees (and presumably the customers who have driven that growth) by hiring strong young people to pack, lift, and transport heavy objects while they are in the prime of fitness. It trains them for the larger work world after moving and then launches them. Then it hires more.
Pay Us $15 Million and Shut Up About It
That's kind of a cool business model. But the feds don't like it. They began investigating Meathead Movers roughly a decade ago. Then they slapped the company with a demand for $15 million and changes in its internal practices to settle the EEOC's age-discrimination claims.
"We of course said, 'sorry, we can't afford that' and I'm never going to agree to go out of business," Meathead Movers CEO Aaron Steed objects in a video posted to Facebook. "From there, we had three mediations, all of which failed. I agreed to all the non-monetary demands: changing our training, changing the wording in our slogan, all kinds of things. And still, they wanted an eight-figure settlement which would have bankrupted my company."
The EEOC didn't like Steed going public, so it told the company to shut up. Meathead Movers wouldn't be allowed to share its ordeal or its side of the story with the public.
"The EEOC issued a gag order demanding that Aaron and his company cease all public communication—including social media posts—about the case, under threat of additional legal action," according to the Goldwater Institute, which is now involved in the case. "In other words, the government is now trampling on the First Amendment rights of the company's founder, simply because it doesn't like that the company is sharing the truth about the government's actions in this case."
The Only People With a Complaint Are Federal Bureaucrats
Interestingly, the EEOC isn't backing a lawsuit filed by aggrieved current or former employees—it's still trawling for anybody with an axe to grind against Meathead Movers on the agency's website, desperately looking for "individuals aged 40 or older who applied to Meathead and believe they were not hired because of their age." In the absence of somebody with a complaint, the EEOC launched its own lawsuit based on its distaste for the company's philosophy and business practices.
"Within the EEOC, no current or former employee has ever filed an age discrimination claim against Meathead Movers," noted Dylan Foreman of local NBC affiliate KSBY in a March story about the case. "The EEOC has filed only eight lawsuits based on its own initiated investigations within the last 10 years across all statutes and in all federal courts across the entire country."
The EEOC admits that even short of lawsuits, "directed investigations" in the absence of complaints by aggrieved individuals are unusual and constitute "far less than 1%" of its volume.
That makes the ongoing crusade against this moving company highly unusual. Federal bureaucrats are going out of their way to torment a business—CEO Aaron Steed says the company has run up $1.5 million in legal costs so far—in the absence of any aggrieved parties other than themselves.
The Tri-County Chamber Alliance, representing chambers of commerce in San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Ventura counties, calls the case against Meathead Movers "a shocking government shakedown by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission."
Is the EEOC Waging a Personal Vendetta?
Frankly, it looks like a personal vendetta or a hit job. It's certainly something worth looking into. And that's exactly what the Goldwater Institute is now doing.
Last week, after federal bureaucrats ignored a public records request on behalf of Meathead Movers, Goldwater filed a lawsuit against the EEOC seeking "records pertaining to the total number of complaints against Meathead Movers, publicly-available information about the EEOC's investigation of Meathead Movers, information about other agency-initiated lawsuits, including allegations of age discrimination, and communications about Meathead Movers, including to and from specific EEOC officials."
Maybe with the help of the Goldwater Institute, Meathead Movers will finally discover why federal bureaucrats want to drive the company out of business.
She doesn’t look black to me. Not even an Indian or native American.
A small percentage of the population is motivated by a desire to harm others. We have all met such people who love the damage they can cause. A job like at EEOC is a plum position for such people. They can use their power to destroy while pretending that it is for the public good.
“Hire the workers as “Models”.
You can discriminate any way you want.”
That was my thought too. The “Hooter’s” defense...
“She doesn’t look black to me. Not even an Indian or native American.”
Hence, my posting the photo.
These rules exist in order to ensure that people with severe mental disabilities can be hired to top positions within the government bureaucracy.
Fire all the bureaucrats involved in the shakedown of this company. That will save us some tax dollars, right there.
The two best moving guys I ever had were two late-middle aged winos who came with the moving company. They smelled like metabolized alcohol but carried these straps and knew every trick in the book for using them to move stuff efficiently without dropping anything or damaging anything. They had everything out in about 2 hours less than I estimated.
Defund the EEOC!
Feds in this case are acting in accordance with directives from CaCaLand politicos.
This state has been racist (any “ist” you might think of) for decades. Pandering is SOProcedure.
If Fed behavior is in violation of a Fed law there is no excuse to not fire and jail the feds involved.
But, this Admin won’t do that.
These bureaucrats need to go after this company because the same argument by the moving company can be used by police and fire departments.
Never mind, that two guys of the moving company in question, moved all of Karen's property in good shape and on time.
Karen discovered Girl Power when Karen received the bill.
So two guys are guilty, according to Karen, of "making 'physical movements' while Republican and/or male," Karen tells fellow Girl Power Storm Trooper working for the government.
Hey, she looks almost as black as Rachel Dolezal ever did.
Aren’t these actions by EEOC complaint driven? If so this means somebody complained. Somebody obviously not suited for the job.
Lemme guess: the people in charge of the case were former high school geeks who belonged to the chess club.
Maybe it is time for Trump to shut down the EEOC.
That Babylon Bee is a hoot.
Oh wait. Never mind.
If strip clubs are allowed to pick and choose attractive women, a moving company can choose men who are capable of physically doing the job.
All Law enforcement agencies, fire departments, and the U.S. military have age requirements that require you to be in top physical condition. Why can't a company that needs strong, physically-fit individuals for heavy lifting do the same?
The Constitution has an age requirment to be President, an age requirement to be a US Senator. That is unConstitutional. <:
"Artistic" and "theatrical performances" are exempted from the requirement.
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.