Scott Adams, who generally has excellent insight on this type of thing, says Epstein would have been stupid to maintain a client list. Whatever they are withholding, it's not Epstein's client list, which never existed in all likelihood.
Scott is spot on! I like his Coffee with Scott Adams videos.
They just need to release everything.
We are adults who can analyze information .
Trump’s stonewalling indicates he is being untruthful, MEGA knows it and is not giving it up so it will cause many to just stay home come mid-terms... Maybe he wants an impeachment...
What is not explained is how Epstein went from being a Math teacher to a fabulously wealthy individual who could buy and build what was on his island and consort with the world’s elite and powerful and wealthy.
“Epstein’s client list”
It has been alleged that Epstein was gathering blackmail material on powerful people.
This material has been thought to include videotapes.
Also because the Democrats were in power for four years do you think if there were “Client lists” that incriminated any big wheels in both parties available and there was no action to “cleanse them”?
Nice damage control article lasereye!
Why won’t these people who want the truth, just go away?
“ Scott Adams, who generally has excellent insight on this type of thing, says Epstein would have been stupid to maintain a client list. Whatever they are withholding, it’s not Epstein’s client list, which never existed in all likelihood.”
I have been saying this forever! Mayflower you ain’t as smart as you think you are.
A judge sealing evidence only precludes its public disclosure.
This does NOT prevent the FBI and DOJ using that evidence to track down perps and issue indictments.
They do not need the victim’s permission and, given the video evidence (which Bondi has described as hundred of hours of child pornography), they won’t even need the victim’s testimony. Any reference to the ID of the victims could continue to be withheld publicly.
Epstein’s blackmail operation would be useless unless the video was clear enough to identify the perps, otherwise, they’d say “you can’t make me out in that!” and not subscribe to the blackmail.
SO the fact that they are not pursuing any charges is because they don’t want to.
The swamp has won. They’re just holding off a bit until Trump leaves office.
Then we will be totally screwed.
And so will Trump, and those working with him, because they will have no reason not resume the lawfare as punishment when he leaves office.
The only way to stop THAT is to hit back at the swamp - use the Epstein perps to begin tracing the blackmail op back to the government.
Biden and the autopen- that has seriously damaged this country. That, and Mayorkas’ actions in government under Biden. I’m not saying to drop Epstein all together, but we need to go after the bigger fish.
It says the author is Scott Johnson, not Scott Adams.
People will just have to get over it and move on.
So, of the list that you posted I will include what I “know” and what I “agree” with. I have actually read the original court files, had a copy of the plea agreement and I have read the original case files that the girls filed to overturn the plea deal back in the late 2000’s. This is all stuff that exists before the case reached worldwide attention in the last 5+ years when exposed by the Miami Herald.
Dersch and many other high powered attys were involved - local and national. Dersch stayed involved in a case the girls filed - not as an active attorney but as an “intervenor.” Dersh knows just about everything. Things were sealed. Dersh has atty-client priveledge, which survives death in the State of Florida.
The term “client list” is just a convenient way of listing Epstein associates - either possibly dirty or innocent. It also refers to flight logs. Trump is not impuned in the files. Billy clinton seems to have difficulties, and the Prince seems pretty dirty. I agree with the following:
• Epstein never created a “client list.” The FBI interviewed alleged victims who named several “clients.” These names have been redacted and the related records sealed. The names specified may or may not be accurate. The names do not include any current officeholders. The courts have also sealed negative information about some of the accusers to protect them.
• President Trump reportedly banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, long before becoming president. Dershowitz has seen nothing that would suggest anything improper or even questionable with Epstein on Trump’s part.
• Dershowitz expresses “absolutely no doubt” that Epstein never worked for an intelligence agency. “If he had, he would surely have told me and his other lawyers, who would have used that information to get him a better deal.” Epstein was unsatisfied with the plea deal he got.
The idea that Epstein is “undercover” - US or Israel, is due to a statement by the then US Atty for S. Florida - Acosta. Nothing in the files makes this assertion. The discussion and drafting of the plea agreement, as disclosed, is amazing.
It would also “seem” to me that Gilsaine is correct, that the US Atty office in DC (and Acosta but he doesn’t necessarily speak for DC) was willing to give immunity to others than Epstein and this immunity was not local to S. FLorida. Even if I am incorrect, she has a strong arguement. My opinion is based on the Acosta comment that this is not just a “local issue” and that Epstein is “protected.” All of this stuff took an inordiante amount of time, from a rather simple case, to get sorted out.
ADAM
@AdameMedia
JUST IN - Trump triples down and says Democrats’ “new SCAM” is the “Epstein Hoax,” adding that his “PAST” supporters have “bought into this ‘”bullshit,’ hook, line, and sinker.”
Wow. Just wow.
https://x.com/AdameMedia/status/1945479898056798666
Trump’s statement can be found at the link. He is basically insulting those in his base who still believe in this “scam”.
Trump should remember the Truth shall set you free...