Have the Democrats already eliminated the incriminating evidence?
We are talking about very powerful people, and the very powerful are always hard to prove guilt because they have ways of obstructing justice in silence. I want to hear more from the Virginia Giuffre's "Dead Man's Switch" files that we have been teased about. Is there any concrete evidence there, or is there not?
I pray there are good hard concrete evidence in those files, not just hearsay.
Is the latest announcement, along with the claims made by Elon, just theater to get people talking about it, and perhaps get the MSM interested in the story believing that they may be able to expose Trump's alleged involvement with Epstein?
No one, including me, believes that there is no there to the story, or that Epstein committed suicide wither. There is a cover up, but what really is the end game here?
I still believe in Trump, and doing the right thing regardless of the consequences, but only for those who engaged in the under-age sexual crimes.
Anyone who associated with him after 2008 needs to have their name exposed. That’s when he was convicted as a pedophile. Anyone dealing with him at that point probably has some secrets in the closet. They certainly deserve contempt.
Anyone who traveled to Epstein island after his 2008 conviction is a suspect and does not deserve any privacy. The feds use guilt by association every day against us. Many J6 people such as Stuart Rhodes were convicted of guilt by association.
This is one of those moments where the rich and powerful have to suffer reputational damage just like regular people do for their bad choices.