Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: whyilovetexas111
Tired of hearing this as well. If being vulnerable to attack means obsolescence then all ships are obsolete. Always have been.

The carrier, at its introduction, was able to be sunk by a couple of well placed 1,000 lb bombs falling from a single engine diver. Frankly the battleship is not obsolete either with proper air, tarp, and missile defense.

Battle group effectiveness against all attack vectors determines survivability of ships.

12 posted on 06/19/2025 7:38:52 AM PDT by Frank Drebin (And don't ever let me catch you guys in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Frank Drebin
If being vulnerable to attack means obsolescence then all ships are obsolete.

It's not just "being vulnerable to attack". It's that an aircraft carrier can only be used against enemies with obsolete weapons. Enemies with modern weapons can sink them relatively easily.

23 posted on 06/19/2025 8:07:14 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Frank Drebin

Aircraft carriers were extremely vulnerable in WWII. They also helped win the war in the Pacific. But so did land based attack aircraft. The B-25’s armed as gunships under Gen. Kenney did a wonderful job of supporting MacArthur’s campaigns. The important lesson is that what was required was combination using land based aircraft where you could and carriers where you couldn’t.


24 posted on 06/19/2025 8:08:35 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson