Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the RAT Changes Everything – Air India 171 Update
YouTube ^ | 06/14/2025 | Captain Steeeve

Posted on 06/15/2025 3:39:57 PM PDT by TexasKamaAina

In this update to our original video on Air India Flight 171, Captain Steeeve revisits his initial theory—and sets the record straight.

Previously, Steeeve leaned heavily into the possibility that the pilot may have accidentally retracted the flaps instead of the landing gear during the takeoff roll, resulting in a critical loss of lift. But new, higher-quality footage tells a different story.

In this video, we clearly see the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) deployed—something that only happens in the event of significant power loss. This changes everything. Steeeve breaks down what the RAT deployment means, walks through the new evidence frame by frame, and explores the very real possibility that this was a dual engine failure scenario.

It’s important to get these stories right. Aviation is a world of learning—and when new information comes to light, good pilots update their understanding.

If you watched the original video, don’t miss this one.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: airindia; auxiliarypower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: delta7

“ it was an unwanted job to have to deploy and test them”

Why was that?


61 posted on 06/15/2025 8:33:03 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Diversity is our Strength” just doesn’t carry the same message as “Death from Above”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Here is a simpler RAT on a competing A320. You’ll be able to see why nobody wants to do this job:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hG4NavVFyg


62 posted on 06/15/2025 8:40:48 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

A level nose doesn’t generate nearly as much lift as higher angle of attack. Pitching up means more lift (to a certain point), but also more drag (slows you down). Max glide range will vary based on several factors, but a higher angle of attack to maximize L/D ratio would give the most time to try to fix a loss of power issue. Couple seconds, but that might be enough if you can restart a failed engine


63 posted on 06/15/2025 8:57:26 PM PDT by Svartalfiar (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

The flight path in yellow under the solid white line is drawn from ADS-B transponder data - the loss of power appears to have killed the ADS-B transponder hence why that solid data ends and the dashed line continues from there and extrapolates the flight path to the crash point.

In other words, the yellow slope is the actual data transmitted by the plane before the ADS-B system went offline for as-yet unconfirmed reasons and received by ground/orbital systems.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_Dependent_Surveillance%E2%80%93Broadcast

ADS-B is what a lot of these flight tracking sites use.


64 posted on 06/15/2025 11:59:58 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
that flight path is at odds with the videos and Verbal description of the plane “using the last brick in the runway” before taking off.

AMD is notoriously dusty, see video on youtube of daytime departure of other heavies at AMD. There are hundred of narrowbody takeoffs sweeping the runway down the centreline but few widebodies. So when dry, you will see dust on almost all take offs.

I live in AMD and this was an enourmous shock to us all. I also believe the pilot tried to put down in an empty ground because just ahead of him is a huge Govt Hospital. That is why he veered left, imho.

65 posted on 06/16/2025 12:11:27 AM PDT by IndianChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
This video was taken by a kid from a low income family. Probably not a sophisticated smartphone, he was taking video to show his classmates how planes fly and that he lived under planes going and coming very low over his fathers rented home, because many had never or rarely seen one. The poor kid is in severe trauma now.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/new-updates/wanted-to-show-my-friends-how-planes-fly-the-story-of-a-boy-whose-video-of-the-air-india-crash-went-viral-worldwide/articleshow/121852096.cms?from=mdr

66 posted on 06/16/2025 12:21:20 AM PDT by IndianChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: IndianChief
This video was taken by a kid from a low income family. Probably not a sophisticated smartphone,

The video is important for investigators and especially so if there is damage to the black boxes..

67 posted on 06/16/2025 5:04:43 AM PDT by EVO X ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: virgil

It’s not that there wasn’t gas in it. Apparently there are impurities that can creep in if the guys refueling are not diligent. And that sort of thing can cause both engines to flame out at the same time.


68 posted on 06/16/2025 7:17:57 AM PDT by cuban leaf (2024 is going to be one for the history books, like 1939. And 2025 will be more so, like 1940-1945.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Justa

I’m no expert. It was something that was mentioned as a possible cause by the experts. Even the ones that were strongly suggesting originally that they accidentally raised the flaps instead of the landing gear.

BTW, I’m no fan of boieng. Actually, I used to be. But Boeing is gone. What we have is McDonnel Douglas with a new purchased name: Boeing. They are not an engineering company like Boeing. They are a for profit company first and foremost. So if this turns out to be a flaw in the plane, it’s not skin off my nose.

I just think it’s highly unlikely.


69 posted on 06/16/2025 7:22:09 AM PDT by cuban leaf (2024 is going to be one for the history books, like 1939. And 2025 will be more so, like 1940-1945.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Thanks.


70 posted on 06/16/2025 8:38:51 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (The road is a dangerous place man, you can die out here...or worse. -Johnny Paycheck, 1980, Reno, NV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma
The FO was in that cockpit with 1100 hrs total time. That’s just a data point but a ridiculously low amount of time for an ATP rating. In the U.S. 1500 hrs minimum is required and it wouldn’t be in a top line aircraft. Air India states that the 1100 hours were in a 787. Overall hours are 3000+ This is from a letter the CEO addressed to all members of their Frequent Flyer programme
71 posted on 06/19/2025 6:08:11 AM PDT by IndianChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: IndianChief

Lots of new information and speculation out there but still no word from authorities, not that I would expect one so soon. What’s telling to me is no FAA emergency order for 787 inspections.


72 posted on 06/19/2025 6:57:58 AM PDT by VTenigma (Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson