Posted on 05/26/2025 4:04:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Eh, he should stay in England.
Moron No. 1, meet Moron No. 2.
I think the reason Trump hasn’t made the Epstein list public is for just this type of situation.
That assigned duty may end up becoming a rather sticky wicket!
NO KING BUT KING JESUS!
King Charles—the economic mastermind. Right.
“The UniParty is two wings of the same bird, a vulture.”
Oooo! That’s GOOD!
To push Global Warming/Climate Change when it’s freezing in Eastern Canada
Now we’ll find out with the queen would let the dolt actually do anything until after she passed.
What a crock!
He has absolutely nothing to do with the British economic system...
Except to suck a few hundred million dollars a year in royal support...
Things that you can’t make up. Charles, with whatever capacity he may have, not much. Is consulting Canada on defence. Meanwhile, Starmer is trying to start WWIII with Russia, with Carney’s help from Canada. In fairness I can’t leave Macron out, with their French army and 6 rounds each, that military may rival Britians. You can’t make this crap up, no way or how. Is Europe trying to get erased? They keep trying to get the US involved, screw that!
Globalist pos “king”.
The speech he will deliver will be written by “his government” just like the one he would deliver anywhere else he is the King.
It has been a very long time since the monarch has personally attended the state opening of Parliament in Canada, though - not since Queen Elizabeth II many decades ago.
What's great about the headline is that it keeps up the lie that Canada is distinct from The Crown. It's not.
Using "British" as an adjective to distinguish him from the other king Charles - oh, that's right, there is no other King Charles.
In related news:
Sylvester the Cat and Coyote meet to plan their offense against Tweety Bird and Roadrunner.
I expect similar outcomes.
King Charles III is just as much, wholly and separately, King of Canada as he is King of the U.K. This author appears to be unaware of this basic fact in portraying this as a visit by King Charles to Canada on behalf of the U.K., despite his including of the Reuters article which points that out. The speech may include things Canada will do to bolster economic ties to the U.K. but that would be what is written for him by “his government” in Canada and would be their policy. He would not be addressing parliament as King of the U.K. but as the King of Canada.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.