Posted on 05/14/2025 8:11:54 PM PDT by bitt
As the Washington DC U.S. Attorney, Ed Martin was in position to address the known and documented activity of a variety of former DOJ officials. There’s a strong argument to be made that’s the reason why the DOJ’s corrupt allies in congress moved to eliminate the threat Martin represented. However, their collective result didn’t remove him, nor did it change the objective, it just changed Mr Martin’s title.
Washington DC USAO Ed Martin carried the authority of the Attorney General, in the changed dynamic special appointee ADAG Ed Martin now carries the authority of the President of the United States to investigate a weaponized DOJ/FBI apparatus. It became a serendipitous outcome.
In this episode of Tucker Carlson the former Fox News host interviews the head of the newly formed ‘weaponization working group’ Ed Martin. Within the interview Martin outlines the mysterious motives of the FBI handling of the J6 “pipe bomber” case, alleging that basic investigative steps were overlooked. “They didn’t interview some of the people that you would have said, ‘That might be a suspect.’ They hadn’t interviewed him,” he said. Raising concerns about the agency’s competence, he added, “The question becomes, ‘what’s happening here?’ Is it incompetence? It feels worse than incompetence.”
When asked by Carlson whether the DOJ is worse than people believe, Martin went further, declaring, “I think it’s worse than incompetence.” “The only way forward is not to describe what I think of the motives but to expose over and over again what’s happened. If you expose what happened and the truth gets out, then accountability is possible.” Martin then described the issues facing the DOJ as “much, much worse than people think.”
WATCH: 1:21:03 HRS
Chapters:
0:00 Ed Martin’s Response to the Crazed Leftist Who Spit in His Face
7:21 Why Would Republican Senator Thom Tillis Want to Destroy Martin?
8:33 Tillis’s Mission to Lock Up January 6th Protestors
16:14 The DOJ Is a Much Bigger Mess Than People Realize
21:43 The Republicans Trying to Sabotage Trump
31:12 Crime and Homelessness in DC
33:48 The CIA Operations Hidden Within Universities
39:02 Martin’s Plan to Clean Up DC
40:26 DC’s Absurd Gun Control Policy
54:09 Martin’s War on Wikipedia
59:54 Martin’s Plan to Repair Election Integrity in America
1:04:46 The Corruption of Merrick Garland, Obama, and Biden
1:10:04 Will We See the Epstein Files?
1:10:46 The DNC and RNC Pipe Bombs
1:12:34 Will We Ever Know What Happened With the 2020 Election?
1:13:52 Will We See Accountability in Washington?
1:18:54 Is the Democrat Party Getting Worse?
It sounds like you are not familiar with how these agencies have gotten rid of people. Let us walk through it slowly.
1. Required all employee to report to the office and ending telework. Many thousands of employees retired or quit at that point.
2. Fired probationary employees. That has led to a bunch of lawsuits and it differs by agency and location—but they are mostly gone. Many have moved on to new jobs in the private sector or elsewhere. They are not coming back.
3. DRP 1.0 (deferred resignation program) This was a carrot where employees who agreed to leave signed contracts promising the agencies they would not sue them for any reason. In exchange they were paid until a given date (usually September 30) and did not have to report to work in the meantime unless the agency requested them to do so. Otherwise they were on administrative leave. Many thousand of folks took that option.
4. Closures of departments, divisions, other nooks and crannies, local offices. Many thousands of folks are gone from that. Some are suing, some are not. All are gone for now.
5. DRP 2.0. This was offered recently and was a big success once the federal employees were convinced the administration was serious. We are probably talking in the range of six figures of federal employees went for this. Remember—that means they cannot sue for any reason under the contract they signed.
6. RIF (Reduction in force). This is a complex process and is only being used as a last resort—and has a bunch of (predicted) court challenges. In most agencies it will not be needed to meet the administrations target numbers.
Bottom line—When you fight with all your weapons you win.
And you’re saying that FBI and DOJ didn’t carry out those measures that Trump initiated?
I am saying the DOJ and FBI has not carried out those measures.
That is why I want President Trump to fire Bondi and Kash.
Sure they may be doing a lot or maybe nothing. Impossible to say this early. The Epstein business made Blondi look pretty darn bad that much I do know.
Patel publicly stated he took the Epstein files back from her, due to a trove of new evidence. She didn’t fail to produce, she doesn’t have the case.
She’s focused on immigration/deportations, and doing a bang-up job on both that, and gang related crimes.
Didn’t Trump make those offers to all federal employees? How would they not apply to DOJ and FBI?
Agency heads made the DRP offers when they were made.
I have seen unconfirmed rumors that some small number of DRP offers were made by Bondi in DOJ, none by Kash in the FBI.
Patel publicly stated he took the Epstein files back from her“
I believe Patel said Epstein committed suicide. That is really alarming. The assertion is preposterous and insulting.
Do we have any way of finding out if those rumors are true?
I follow federal employee discussion groups on Reddit.
That is where the rumors come from—and eventually if true the confirmation from mass media sources that cover individual agencies.
If those rumors are true then the only justification for it that I can think of off the top of my head would be to try to catch them in treasonous acts and let them lead investigators to the whole group of treasonous conspirators.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.