Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lean-Right

Thanks for the info-I still don’t think that anyone needs to hunt an animal that lives for a century or two unless they are overpopulating-hunt something else...


26 posted on 05/01/2025 12:45:14 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Texan5

Nope.
Be like hunting Galapagos Tortoises to make soup


34 posted on 05/02/2025 12:52:18 AM PDT by Salamander (Please visit my profile page to help me go home again. https://www.givesendgo.com/GCRRD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Texan5

Just becaue they can live for
a centuary, doesn’t mean that
those alive and succeptable to
hunt are a hundred years old.
When one subsistance hunts,
none are taken more than what
is required to sustain a thriving
human population. Children are
fed, and elders that can no longer
push through the physical
demands are cared for. Been
this way for hundreds of years.
And, guess what? There’s still
enough of those whales alive
to feed that population.
It’s in their blood to perpetuate
their survival. Natives know
not to eliminate a long standing
food source. Just as the buffalo
of the great plains. It wasn’t
the indians (natives) that wiped
them out.


44 posted on 05/12/2025 12:15:22 AM PDT by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson