President Trump’s official message: “Biden let Millions of Criminals into our Country, totally unchecked and unvetted, with no Legal authority to do so. Yet, in order to reverse this assault on our Nation, I am expected to go through a lengthy Legal process, separately, for each and every Criminal Alien.”
“As usual, Democrats enforce TWO DIFFERENT STANDARDS.”
It’s nice to know that someone has been reading my posts:
“As I’ve noted many times before, Trump can declare that we have been invaded, announce the suspension of habeas corpus and none of this applies. To minimize the bad PR from doing that, Trump can make the announcement when the deportees are loaded on the plane on the runway, and then revoke it when they arrive at the destination country, and repeat as many times as necessary. Not even SCOTUS can stop that.”
🎯👀
The Dems would go thermonuclear apes**t over this in about 1.732 seconds.
I can see it now if he tried: “PRESIDENT TRUMP DEFIES SUPREME COURT AND SUSPENDS THE RULE OF LAW!” THIS IS 3rd WORLD BANANA REPUBLIC STRONGMAN TACTICS!
WE MUST IMPEACH THIS DICTATOR NOW BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!
Wish-casting.
Will never occur is my prediction.
Lots of national socialists in the comments section on that article.
The CURRENT USSC, would find it un-Constitutional (WRONGLY).
NOTHING will stop the Lawfare, with the embedded interests holding control of ALL government-dependent peons....
So long as taxpayers are fleeced, to create MORE consumer dollars to those who produce nothing, the corruption will continue.
Trump simply isn’t rounding up enough invaders to justify such a radical move.
The invaders are each going to get a hearing. The Roberts court will insist on it. Trump should not get into a battle with the Supreme Court.
A remittance tax could fund the process. Trump needs to ask Congress to tax money transfers at say 10%.
This will never happen. It is a bad idea.
“MS-13 gangbangers”
The only person it is claimed he hurt was his wife. The only other bad activity alleged is driving invaders from Texas north. He might have simply worked for traffickers as a side gig.
He can’t be deported for domestic violence because current federal law requires a conviction.
Committing a serious crime should be grounds enough for deportation, but current law requires a conviction. Congress needs to change the law so the deportation can occur after criminal activity that currently or historically could result in imprisonment for over 89 days where it was committed.
We don’t need to have alien criminals living among us. There are plenty of decent aliens who would be happy to be here instead.
Trump needs to get into a limosine and get driven to the Capitol and ask for the changes in the law he needs to work in a smooth manner.
You put the aliens through the process Roberts would want.
If more immigration judges are needed, Trump can nominate them.
Imagine if Trump got to pick 90% or more of the immigration judges.
Trump can ask Congress to change the law so aliens can no longer claim tax credits.
And all their faces ended up on our national currency
A bit off topic, but I'd like to see the $1000 bill revived, with President Trump's face on it. (Maybe also print a $3 bill with Obama while we're at it.)
47 suspends Habeas Corpus, 30 minutes after signing it into law, district court judge declares it illegal and unconstitutional.
bump
Enough is enough – it’s time for President Trump to consider suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus to deport the millions of illegal aliens who invaded our country.It’s in the Constitution – Article 1, Section 9
Enough is enough.
Suspension of the privilege of habeas corpus is a Legislative power found in Article I, the powers of the legislature. There is zero Executive power to suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus.
Ex Parte Bollman and Swartwout, 8 U.S. 75 (1807), Marshall, CJ
But this point also is decided in Hamilton's Case and in Burford's Case.If at any time the public safety should require the suspension of the powers vested by this act in the courts of the United States, it is for the legislature to say so.
That question depends on political considerations, on which the legislature is to decide. Until the legislative will be expressed, this Court can only see its duty, and must obey the laws.
Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2, 130-31 (1866) 9-0.
The suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus does not suspend the writ itself. The writ issues as a matter of course, and, on the return made to it, the court decides whether the party applying is denied the right of proceeding any further with it.
There is no such thing as suspension of the writ itself. The writ continues to issue and must be answered.