How can he claim that if he doesn’t already have the evidence?
He’s announcing the launch of a research effort. Probably should have qualified it somewhat...
I spect that it will be the mercury.
They might already know what is causing it but it’s been suppressed.
Increased awareness and testing accounts for about 25% of the increase, mainly for marginal cases that might have been missed in the past.
But the severe cases we only learned about in health class, we never saw it ourselves in the 70s and 80s.
But when you see someone with severe and/or non-verbal autism it’s next to impossible to miss, especially if you’re used to working with these people.
(I helped with special needs students at our church)
Too many boastful, premature announcements.
How can he claim that if he doesn’t already have the evidence?
_____
Yes, exactly. If you have your bomb, drop your bomb. No weekend teases, summer-long teases...
Just tell us.
Because he DOES have the evidence? Just needs to compile and format it properly, probably.
In my view, when read with discernment, the evidence is already in the published research as to the cause of autism: genetic abnormalities due to inadequate Vitamin D and magnesium in the American diet.