Posted on 04/09/2025 11:45:36 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
This sort of invites the goverment to bring said gang members to the court, and the court can take care of these dudes.
If I understood correctly, the previous USSC slap down was for basically not being in proper jurisdiction, but did not rule on merits. Now the merits will be heard.
Republicans, in general, follow the law. Democrats are showing that on a routine basis, they ignore the law.
Curious to know what grounds they even have for a habeas petition.
The court said individuals can bring habeas corpus cases one by one. These appear to be named individuals so perhaps it is in line with the ruling. That DC guy tried to bring a ruling on a class of people. That’s what was overturned.
Why would the dems want to keep violent criminals in the USA?
- because they hate the USA and want to turn it over to thugs who will vote democrat.
More than that: it blocked all blanket actions, which this order appears to be violating. Habeas petitions require a case by case consideration.
They become gods in their second year of law school.
Ah, more reporting from the hack Cristina Laila.
Does she know the TRO is in place because the alleged TdA members have filed habeas petitions and those petitions must be acted on? Per a 9-0 ruling from the USSC?
My gosh, she is such a journalistic hack.
Ah, yes, I stand corrected. So what would be the proper DOJ action now? I would think they just ignore and tell the judges to pound sand. Meanwhile Roberts should be saying something, but he probably wont.
This is completely in line with the SCOTUS ruling.
And it will be case by case for Petitioners J.A.V., J.G.G., and W.G.H.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txsd.2000771/gov.uscourts.txsd.2000771.12.0.pdf
The Supremes already ruled ignore the rogue pieces of scum.
About time to suspend the us constitution and go full bore on this crap.
This is a class, which is expressly forbidden by SCOTUS' order.
Ignorant people don't get that. Just talked with one at work.
Two federal judges are the finalists, to play against each other, in a chess game championship . . .
Votes!
>> The lower courts say “To Hell With The Supreme Court”!
not quite, it’s a jurisdictional play
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.