Also the funding of disappearing billions to our armed forces and those of Ukraine and who knows where else. If those money flows stops, what horrors will ensue?
The contrary argument would be made by John Maynard Keynes, who's idea of a full employment surplus was consistently proven wrong.
I still get annoyed that govt spending is even considered part of GDP. No issues with the sales reporting of companies getting govt contracts if they produce something, but NGOs getting govt funding should not be considered as GDP and GDP shouldn’t increase just because the govt takes on more debt and spends more.
GDP measurements may have made sense 100 years ago when they were devised - when we had sound money, and overnment was smaller and was generally more limited and mission-driven
GDP measurements are now an absolute joke.
Exhibit 1A is New York City. NYC has a nominal GDP of $1.2 trillion. Greater than the Netherlands or Saudi Arabia. Approximately 70% of ostensible Russian GDP
What does NY really produce?
Certainly some of that is some manufacturing at basic level (clothes? food?) as well as tourism, entertainment, and a large Port and airport? But BY FAR, the biggest components are government and Wall Street financial trading.