Posted on 01/28/2025 5:01:54 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man
“They had a previously-created radiation map, and were looking for any divergences from those numbers, which could either indicate a dirty bomb or a hot nuke.”
That makes sense.
Another angle is that this is part of the large dirty bomb training involving several agences that is going on now in NY this week.
Maybe they put a nuclear source somewhere in a large area and told the players to find it. After that segment, they move on to train on how to handle material once found.
I think the part about glowing orbs shape shifting into drones is a hoax. When you focus a cell phone camera in, to get a closer look, the aircraft will appear to turn into a glowing light. Focus out again, and - tada! - it’s an aircraft again. That’s what happened when I took a video.
This sort of stuff wouldn't happen if people started using real cameras again.
I don’t drink Kool-Aid, but I do believe in a healthy skepticism with regards to all conspiracies... After all... If you believe in one, you may as well believe in them all.
Maybe I should contact the agency and request a monthly reward for advancing their agenda... Do you think they would be so generous? I doubt it... They would likely say that all the conspiracies are obviously true... And then admonish me for thinking otherwise.
Osprey drones are orbs, the rotate the engines, then fly straight. Then switch on red/green navigation lights.
Trump just said the drones were real.
I saw nobody who was "extremely emotional", "fearful", or "out of control". Just people who wanted to know what the drones were doing.
What is obvious is the government shouldn't keep such secrets.
No, I cant find the video in my history.
Over the years Ive been one of the first to say that you already know that the story is a lie if it came from the government but I think this might be pretty close to the truth because they do sometimes tell something similar to the truth as part of the lie to distract you from what they are really doing. It wasnt one of those stories that was promoted, I saw that one reference and it disappeared. I dont think it was supposed to be talked about publicly.
Why would the government tell something similar to the truth? Well because the hysteria was necessary and that is something that I think I have some proof for as I was able to find that video in my history.
Schumer and Peters wrote up a "secret" bill that would have given sweeping authority in all drone matters to law enforcement from the local level all the way up. (I did see it reported at the time that Meyer was involved but I cant find that reference right now so you should assume that this report of participation was not factual.)
Here is a video of Ron Paul (8:10) smacking it back in their face.
Pauls concern was that this would “expand federal authority to intercept communications and disrupt drone activity — powers that raise serious concerns for Americans’ privacy, civil liberties, and Fourth Amendment protections against unwarranted search and seizure.”
And I would like to add that its important to remember that there is no such thing as an EV, its a rolling remote controlled computer. Its a drone just as much as these copters are. So would AI taxis or delivery vans/copters be drones. If you hadnt noticed, the car companies are working on AI systems that take control of the "EV" and pull it over if the AI thinks anything is wrong with your driving. They can stop you or your shipment without you even necessarily knowing about it or who at what level was snooping.
The hysteria was necessary to get people to demand government steal our rights.
...and they would have gotten away with it if it werent for that meddling Rand Paul. I cant say that I know that the contractor report was entirely truthful or why Trump felt he shouldnt comment yet but if you remember back to the first time it was brought up to him that the look on his face told you that as far as he knew there was nothing to be concerned about and didnt know why it was being allowed to drive the hysteria. Now we do but he still has to be careful what he says if it is military related.
A good chunk of posters on this forum were @@#$ing their britches on every thread at the time.
The martian/chinese ones are entirely unhinged to the point that they arent even thinking logically.
I don’t think Trump is weak like that.
He fights.
The corrupt Biden administration would never allow Chinese drones to fly over the US. Not even a balloon either, right?
“The term ‘conspiracy theory” was cooked up by the CIA to quell questions.”
The phrase goes back many centuries.
The CIA weaponized it after the JFK assassination to cover their tracks—part of Project Mockingbird (infiltration of mass media).
I will believe it—but I need a lot of details to be persuaded.
That is a reasonable request.
It is not technologically possible.
It is a matter of energy/fuel multiplied by distance. Nothing can carry that many batteries nor that much gas/jet fuel/grannies white lightning to stay aloft that long or for the ranges required.
The drones could only be Chinese if the aliens were sharing their harmonic plasmoid technology which I havent seen proof for either.
Oh, I believe that the FAA approved the drone use. I also believe that the FAA knew some of the drones were too close to airports and controlled airspace.
What I don’t understand is why the FAA would not admit they approved the drone flights.
What I find troubling is which federal agencies were approved to fly drones and what there justification was (i.e. what kind of research and other purposes).
This is where a group needs to do a Freedom of Information request to the FAA as to see the other agency applications and the FAA authorization correspondence.
I am disappointed that Trump did not provide more information beside they were not enemy drones. Obviously, the Deep State convinced Trump that sensitive national security was being conducted by the drones and that releasing more details would jeopardize the “research.” If I were to guess, it would involve a search for radioactive materials.
There were drones. Yes. Many were federal government owned. Others were yahoos having fun, and trying to stir up things. Then there were orbs and other flying objects whose capabilities far surpass anything known by the average person. They can't be called "drones", because, well, they are not. They are a UAP or a UFO, or whatever.
As a drone and aviation enthusiast who lives on an airport... I am not aware of one video that even came close to documenting any actual mysterious activities. This press conference was just the polite way of not calling out a bunch of crackpots who will believe anything. Why would secret drones operating after dark have lights that appear to be the same configuration as aircraft lights?
As far as being the size of cars... you can't determine the size of a flying object unless you know how far away it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.