Posted on 10/17/2024 8:29:13 AM PDT by DFG
Tell me the Democrats aren’t laundering money through ActBlue without telling me the Democrats aren’t laundering money through ActBlue…..
Any act of lawlessness is justified when you’re fighting Nazis.
The democrats are experts at laundering money
But, I thought McCain/Feingold was going to keep so much money from coming into politics? /s
BTTT
They’ve been doing this money laundering thing since at least 2008 (the Clintons has many other money scams but I think most of that was just to line their own pockets and eventually to just buy influence eg the Foundation). When Obama raised a fortune in small dollar online credit card donations - all you needed was a credit card number not even a CCV code or a zip code or name match. One rich guy hired the equivalent of a Bangladeshi click bait farm to type in $18 donations all day and night.
Hillary circumvented donation limits by funneling donor money through the state parties - but required the states to kick 90% of whatever they raised to the national party. She wouldn’t go to the state to fundraise if they didn’t agree. There are no limits on how much a state party can kick up to the national party, and on the FEC forms the donor is listed as the state party. State, not federal. That was part of their “campaign finance reform”. Whatever they name the bill is the opposite. Affordable Care Act is neither affordable nor does it guarantee care. The inflation reduction act increased inflation. The campaign reform bill just legislated in all the loopholes available avoid the limits.
And now ActBlue. Anyone who ever gave $1 is probably listed as a donor of hundreds or thousands and don’t know it because their cards aren’t even being charged. It’s someone else’s money, and likely many federal crimes. AB was telling people they would 9x their donation - if you gave $10 they would add $90 - and they said this openly without explaining exactly how they could raise so much extra money in your name without violating straw donor laws.
Bush signed it, stating “The USSC will likely find it UnConstutional” All he had to do was veto the thing. Far from closing floodgates, it opened a pathway to Billions of dollars from corporate donations, instead of empowering voters.
McCain/Feingold was about allowing politicians to spend tax dollars on their campaigns. That happened.
What isn’t disclosed is almost all of this money is coming out of our taxes.
Damn, that's a good one!
Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
Saul Alinsky
Anyone who denies this has their head fully up their ass, or is a Democrat.
Or both.
It is wholly appropriate that this “law” to protect us was named after two of the biggest pieces of human filth to have ever been in public office.
later
Here is the thing...
It used to be said (by Libertarians) that government had a monopoly on violence.
It can now be said that Democrats have a monopoly on violence. They can break the law, cheat, destroy lives, violate the Constitution, etc... and the Republicans REFUSE to do anything about it.
All the while the Democrats will....
Put Republican advisors, donors, politicians and lawyers in jail
Spy on Catholics and parents at school board meetings
Jail 1500 Republican protestors and wait months or years to give them a trial
Arrest whistleblowers and journalists
Arrest abortion protestors
Put conservatives on no-fly lists
Refuse to provide adequate physical protection for political rivals
Spy on and leak info about conservative politicians
...and on and on, using actual force and violence to destroy their opponents.......
Republicans won’t lift a finger to do anything to the Democrats. Even if Trump wins, just watch anything he does to actually get back at them and even the playing field will be viewed by everyone as “unfair” or “mean” or “tyrannical” so he will back down.
That is just in the elite circles. How about the foot soldiers?
While Leftists burn down cities, loot, shoot people for being the wrong color in the wrong neighborhood, burn churches, etc...
Rightwingers sit on their couches and drink beer while their neighborhoods are invaded by immigrants.
We have lost. It’s over. There is nothing left to save.
Not trying to be argumentative...I’m just naive. Can you explain how this money is coming from taxes?
I decided to see if my name was on the FEC website. It wasn’t, which is interesting, since I did give to Trump. But I saw someone from my area with the same last name giving $2.50 every other day to CodeBlue. Pages of it. It’s clearly a basic money laundering tactic. Break things down into smaller amounts to avoid scrutiny (that and stealing identities).
Just like when Obama’s campaign and whores turned off location verification for online donations and there were thousands within minutes all at the same price. And the OMG interviews with elderly people who apparently given tens of thousands of dollars every year to democrats. They are nohting more than credit card scammers. you don’t get the money charging thousands of dollars. You spread out $4 here $3 there and do it over and over and over.
Merrick Garland and his crack squad of ethical FBI agents will get right on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.