Municipalities far and wide have examined the facts and chosen to fluoridate water then this black robed pig decides he knows better. When he harms 200 million people what is the recourse? Probably about the same as when leftists decided millions of malaria deaths in Africa were worth it to stop the use of DDT.
If the judge has decided that the EPA has not properly studied the comparative risks, the decision seems legitimate. If the judge is deciding as a matter of fact that fluoridation is unsafe, that sounds like a judge making policy, which they are not supposed to do.
Dental problems should not be solved by drinking a potentially poisonous to children fluid. Brushing with fluoride works fine. And sealing children’s teeth works, too.
DDT use ended right about the same time Polio quit being a nation wide “disease”. The absence of Polio we were told was driven by the vaccine, but it was more likely the cessation of the use of DDT, which they used to spray on milking cows.
This “black robed pig” as you called him, might have been looking at the data presented in the case, which you most likely know nothing about(I don’t either).
Oh yeah, fluoride in the drinking water is awesome. Read up on the facts, not just believe water suppliers who are paid beaucoup dollars to rid manufacturers of the poison they would have to pay to be stored or destroyed.
Fluoride lowers IQs it messes with the Thyroid gland and also causes obesity. The link to better teeth is not worth it. Just sell bottled fluoride water to give to kids, see if anyone buys it.
I paid for a very expensive water filter to rid myself of fluoride and chlorine. Otherwise, city water is for watering the lawn, washing dishes or giving to the neighbors cats who I hate.
Municipalities far and wide have examined the facts and chosen to ACCEPT DONATIONS FROM THE ALUMINUM COMPANIES WHO PRODUCE AN UNNATURAL FORM OF FLOURIDE.