1 posted on
09/17/2024 5:24:07 AM PDT by
Jacquerie
To: Jacquerie
2 posted on
09/17/2024 5:28:58 AM PDT by
Loud Mime
(Liberalism is a Socialist Disease. )
To: Jacquerie
Why would anyone assume that an Article V Convention would magically be conservative? Or in the extremely unlikely case that it did produce a more conservative document, that it would be ratified by the requisite 3/4 of the states?
The result could just as easily be something worse, but by far the most likely result is no ratification because the country is too divided.
To: Jacquerie
Interesting then and now. BUMP
4 posted on
09/17/2024 6:00:46 AM PDT by
PGalt
(Past Peak Civilization?)
To: Jacquerie
If only they had taken seriously the anti-federalist's predictions for what the Federal government would grow into in terms of tyranny and oppression.
It only took "four score and seven years" for the thing to go off the rails.
6 posted on
09/17/2024 6:50:50 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: Jacquerie
personally, i’d like SOMEONE to enforce Article 2 Section 1 and have kamala explain how someone with foreign citizen parents at birth could possibly be a natural born citizen
if you need some reading material on the subject, the 39th congress (in 1866) discussed it as they pushed the 14th.
fyi, this article is suppressed by google. you have to use duckduckgo to find it:
https://www.tampafp.com/39th-congress-transcript-anchor-babies-not-u-s-citizens/
7 posted on
09/17/2024 6:57:54 AM PDT by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson