[Dr. Sivana]

So you now don't have the perfect candidate who agrees with you on every little issue.

Mass taxpayer funding for “selective reduction”/baby-killing” is NOT a “little” issue.

[JayGalt]

Selective reduction is not an integral part of IVF. A person who would selectively reduce has chosen to murder just as if they hd an abortion. Most couples limit the transfers to 1 or 2 and commit to keeping a twin pregnancy if one occurs.

I think the choice would be for IVF to be covered by insurance. Many insurances already do cover IVF.
As I explained above it would be a small cost in a family policy just as insisting on covering mammograms raised insurance cost for women or family policies.

Perhaps yuo are unaware that 16 states already mandate coverage for IVF
New Jersey mandate for infertility coverage
Currently only 16 states in the U.S. – including New Jersey – have laws requiring health insurance companies to provide coverage for infertility treatment. The insurance mandate states that any insurance provider who provides pregnancy-related benefits must also cover infertility treatment and IVF costs. The law also requires health plans contracting to cover state employees and teachers to include the same infertility coverage.

[Mogger]

Mass taxpayer funding for “selective reduction”/baby-killing” is NOT a “little” issue.

You are right, it is not.

But cutting off your nose to spite your face gets you nowhere.

We got where we are be incrementalism.

There are two ways out of it.

Incrementalism or the other becomes really bloody.