Replies

And the masters of voter suppression and disenfranchisement keep crushing the little guy. Not one step back!

So they didn’t throw out libertarians or any conservative leaning parties?

Have you read the ruling?

I thought so.

So Wisconsin says third party is OK but Georgia says no. Something really stinks with Georgia.

What difference would it make if they were on the ballot?

Makes me wonder how much Kemp had to do with this.

Georgia Governor Brian Kemp is now asking the Attorney General whether he has the authority to REMOVE the three brave members of the State Election Board who have been implementing massive election integrity reforms

What are you talking about? This is great news. Kennedy was going to pull himself off of the GA ballot anyway. Some lose a bit with Stein being on but it’s a net positive for us. You need to take a win where you can get one.

Brad Raffensperger, Gabriel Sterling and Brian Kemp are all as crooked as they come. They should all be in prison for the 2020 criminal election.

They’re determined to do it again.

Oh yeah... not having your address on your form to be on the ballot disqualifies you from running.

But not listing the address or giving a fake one is perfectly fine for a proper ballot.

WTF

RFK, Jr. is actively trying to REMOVE himself from ballots in swing states, so this is a positive for him.

https://apnews.com/article/rfk-jr-trump-speech-arizona-a2638f89ddcb5de03edbe4574ca17d45

Thank you for referencing that article Enterprise. Please note that the following critique is directed at the corrupt political parties and not at you.

"BREAKING: A Georgia judge says presidential candidates Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Claudia De la Cruz, along with the Georgia Green Party, which nominated Jill Stein, are not qualified to appear on Georgia's ballot."

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

First, note that the main reason for the electoral college is to make sure that the right person is in the wartime Oval Office.

On the other hand, the electoral college is MAJOR overkill for contacting your peacetime federal representatives to complain about the price of postage stamps and slow mail, the US Mail service one of the very few main "federal social spending services" that the states have expressly constitutionally given to the federal government, most federal domestic policy now based on state powers that the unconstitutionally big federal government has stolen from the states imo.

"Article I, Section 8, Clause 7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;"
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
The congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, a constitutional lawmaker, had clarified the federal government's constitutionally limited powers versus the 10th Amendment power of the states to serve the people as follows.
”Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government [emphases added]. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country.” —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.

Getting back to the dos and don'ts of state electoral ballots, in stark contrast to states prohibiting political party candidate names from appearing on a state's ballot, Democratic and Republican Trump supporters are reminded of the following. The 12th Amendment (12A; electoral vote rules) reasonably indicates that electoral vote ballots are write-in ballots, the states unconstitutionally introducing limits to 12A "elector's rights" with the help of the courts imo.

Excerpted from 12A:

"The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President [emphasis added], and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice- President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;--The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;--The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; ..."

Also note that 12A goes on to indicate that when the first, and possibly last stage, which is joint session of Congress, fails to determine who the next president is, the next stage shows that the 3 top electoral vote winners from the first stage are then voted on by the House, a third candidate indicating a possible third party imo.

Originally, the Constitutional allowed for the top 5 electoral vote winners to go to the House, indicating possibly 5 political party candidates.

So I suspect that Pence and J6 Congress confirmed OBiden's challenged electoral vote as fast as they could so that voters wouldn't start asking questions about the next possible stage to determine POTUS.

The bottom line is that corrupt, political party-pirated state and federal governments have unsurprisingly politically rewritten the constitution's electoral vote rules.

The constitutionally reality is that, since worthless career federal lawmakers and renegade states have repeatedly proven that they are enemies of the people imo, it is now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to effectively "impeach and remove" ALL (exceptions?) state and federal lawmakers and executives in November.

In other words, it's now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to start the first major step in draining the swamp by supporting hopeful Trump 47 with a new, Constitution-respecting Congress, new state lawmakers and executives too, not only so that he will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but will support him to quickly finish draining the swamp.

Finally, let's not allow the anti-Trump media try to fade our memories of what we witnessed on July 13.