Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

Watching—thanks.

First question they ask:

“Why wasn’t somebody on that water tower.”

My comment:

If you ask the wrong question you will get the wrong answer.

It looks like there was somebody on that water tower.

https://x.com/maga_juice1776


5 posted on 08/05/2024 7:00:54 PM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg

The correct question (as you point out) is WHO was on the water tower?


12 posted on 08/05/2024 7:22:40 PM PDT by cableguymn (They don't want peace they want skeletons )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg

The water tower theory has been disproven long ago. For one thing, why would someone climb to the top in a precarious position to shoot, unstably, when you have a safe and stable platform below.

The angles don’t work.

The main issue here is that this guy Crooks was allowed to attempt the shot, then he taken out. They knew he was there, they watched him.

This is totally an inside job.


35 posted on 08/06/2024 12:39:05 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson