Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NGAD: Why The U.S. Air Force’s New $300 Million Fighter Is In Trouble
National Security Journal ^ | 7/20/2024 | Robert Farley

Posted on 07/20/2024 8:29:55 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: 9YearLurker
A $300M fighter, pretty much by definition, is a scam.

I remember when we thought a $110 million navy frigate was outrageous.

21 posted on 07/20/2024 10:39:30 AM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

$300 million is a life cycle cost.
Using the same accounting, your car costs $100,000, after you throw in gas consumed, repairs, tires, insurance, licenses, etc.

This author, Robert Farley, has made a career of denigrating the Air Force, its mission, its equipment, and its people.

Of course, he has never been in a modern fighter, like a lot of self- laimed experts here on FreeRepublic.


22 posted on 07/20/2024 11:00:14 AM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Why large?

Some models would be larger and with very long range, so they can carry pods of short-range hunter-killer drones to release and swarm-attack everything in a target area.

All models would be cheap enough to be considered expendable munitions.

The future of war includes a variety of autonomous killing machines controlled by time limits and target zones. The countermeasures will include communications jamming, direct-energy weapons, and autonomous drone-killer systems.

The side that runs out first, loses.

23 posted on 07/20/2024 11:09:43 AM PDT by flamberge (A storm is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

The USAF cannot afford planes or bombers. All part of the historic low 4% of the GDP allocated for the military. Meanwhile, JoeB wants to cut it even lower.

Defense is the only job required of the US government under the Constitution - all other spending is not required.


24 posted on 07/20/2024 11:18:40 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Jeepers, haven't you been paying attention?

Jeepers, Mr Lucky, I haven't heard anyone use the word Jeepers since Pat Brady was riding around in his jeep Nellybelle on the set of Roy Rodgers. You sir are a Full Clown.

25 posted on 07/30/2024 7:24:56 AM PDT by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

I am a former USAF officer.

The writer of this article was not too terribly hard to track down. He writes often about . . . frankly, things he is unqualified to write about.

His PhD is in political science.

It is a technology subject. For certain, politics will determine funding and maybe even missions, but it will not have anything to say about capability and enemy capability and tactics. Strategy? Maybe. But this is a tactical matter.

We are utterly buried by PhDs in subjects that are largely useless. It’s not a difficult dissertation to put together. Contrasted with Physics or Engineering. Then these people begin writing books and developing a voluminous record of publications that are intended to impress and simply should not. They don’t even know what phase differentials in a ring laser gyro do. How can they possibly know anything about navigation?

But be all that as it may be, if folks want to know what is the greatest threat to US national security, well, it has nothing to do with next gen fighter decision making.

It is a report over the past month or two out of China. They say they have a technique to defeat stealth. The quoted methodology looked worrisome.

The End.


26 posted on 07/30/2024 7:42:10 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Must hurt to be outwitted by a full clown.


27 posted on 07/30/2024 7:45:34 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Owen

“His PhD is in political science.”

Which right down there with a PhD in education, journalism, law, and other bottom dwellers.


28 posted on 07/30/2024 7:50:50 AM PDT by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Jeepers Mr Lucky!!


29 posted on 07/30/2024 8:53:55 AM PDT by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Jeepers, haven't you been paying attention?

Jeepers?

30 posted on 10/11/2024 9:15:39 AM PDT by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston
It's a common colloquial term in the English language.

But don't fret, comrade, your English is much better than my Russian.

31 posted on 10/11/2024 11:58:59 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Jeepers Mr Lucky. Thanks for the swell answer 🤡👍


32 posted on 10/11/2024 12:24:01 PM PDT by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson