Posted on 07/19/2024 10:33:18 PM PDT by bitt
(A clear account of the bullets and trajectories)
https://rumble.com/v57hp8j-audio-analysis-is-100-clear-trump-and-crowd-were-shot-at-by-two-separate-pe.html
Almost 1/2 of the security detail was DHS employees.
This is CLEARLY an Inside Job.
From forensic analysis of the audio recording with gunshots, There may have been 3 separate shooters. Only 1 was killed. Other 2 vanished.
My gut tells me they were DHS.
How so?
These wacky conspiracy theorists, or Biden’s FBI and Secret Service?
Not a trick question.
Well in any operation they always compartmentalize the intended patsy.
That’s how they did it in “Shooter” -then compartmentalized the would be assassin of the patsy. Then eliminated him.
Compartmentalization is standard in any operation of course.
I expect more obfuscation like “sloped roofs” etc.
Bongino knows more than I do.
Now that they know that SS is corrupt or incompetent, Merchan might decide it's his duty to sentence Trump to jail in Rikers or other NY hellhole. It's not something a sane judge would do but....
Chris Martenson: 'Rock Solid' Evidence of 'At Least' Two Shooters in Trump Assassination Attempt
I am concerned about this as well.
However, there is literally nothing I can do about it
Maybe Trump’s legal maneuvers can keep him out of danger until January. Emergency appeal to SCOTUS because of the SS screwup (or worse). But that is an incentive for Mayorkas and Garland to try harder to remove Trump from power.
While I think the security will be better. I still don’t believe that Trump and Vance should be on stage together or at the same venue.
Better safe than sorry
I think if there were really two shooters then Trump would be dead.
He/We were very lucky that Crooks was a bad shot!
You can say “utter BS” that is fine. We will see what evidence comes out. With that said, there is a lot of utter BS coming out about SS performance before and after, and incredible BS coming out from SS leadership.
What I do think very strongly is what we have been told is far from complete and probably the truth as well
Yes, we will.
there is a lot of utter BS coming out about SS performance before and after, and incredible BS coming out from SS leadership.
True dat.
What I do think very strongly is what we have been told is far from complete and probably the truth as well
Absolutely, but this video represents the danger of 'noise'.
Nobody will believe the truth if BS speculation turns gaslighting confirmation bias. But after the last 4 years I struggle to GAS.
So accept that the guy presents 'un' science as science in an effective manner, or don't. But know this:
If there was more than one shooter and this wasn't just a case of abject negligence - or (tin hat on) a case of facilitating or enabling the plot, which would have provided the foreknowledge we're seeing evidence of (tin hat off) - DJT would assuredly be DEAD.
I’d prefer a lie detector connected to 100 volt battery with the nodes attached to his scrotum.
Perhaps, but whoever shot that first round was squarely on target and Trumps head movement, lack of movement or a few degrees more to the right or left and he would be DEAD
call it providence or just plain luck, the shooter missed not because of aim
Yes, a bit of providence. But if you do the windage calculations, he was a rank amateur. Untrained.
If he knew how to shoot in a breeze, DJT would be DEAD - head tilt or not - ESPECIALLY if there were - ahem - ‘2 shooters.’
And it isn't as if that would simply be "game, set, match." The questions would still be there, with us up in arms even moreso.
bump
Water tower?
Don’t necessarily disagree, sometimes the answer is the simplest, but disregarding outright isn’t a good look either.
You have no more knowledge as what happened as I do, but your certainty of events is not something I share
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.