[Socon-Econ]

As I understand the article, their problem is that the bums are not trespassing on the victims’ property but are camping in the adjacent woods. If so, the real culptit is the state law allowing this.

[JBW1949]

“...A family in Concord NH have violent, armed vagabonds camping out on their property...”

“THEIR” property...This is the first sentence in the excerpt above...

[lee martell]

That was my impression. State law allows this to continue.
I don’t get accusing these parents of being cowards.
They are outnumbered. for one thing.
The best solution may be for this family to move.
The kids will have a lousy childhood, growing up virtually under siege.

[Tired of Taxes]

The full NY Post article says the homeless encampment is on their property. That is, the wooded area behind their backyard is their property, and it borders train tracks and property owned by a railroad.

But, I don't agree with the above headline, either. The NY Post has a different headline:

Family calls cops 37 times, receives death threats from encampment of violent vagabonds behind dream home: ‘I can’t even use my backyard’

What do people want these parents to do? I can think of a few creative ideas, but the parents are outnumbered. The law seems to be the problem there.