Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: alancarp

The problem is still procedure. The Colorado case was an appeal from the Colorado Supreme Court. Bush v. Gore was an appeal from the Florida Supreme Court. Appeals from State high courts are governed by a writ of certiori. But this would be an appeal from a NY trial court (which, ironically, is called the “supreme court” but it has a different meaning in New York).

Mark keeps making vague references to “common law writs.” Well what is this writ that allows the SCOTUS to yoink a case from a state trial court? It’s not a writ of habeas corpus, it’s not a writ of mandamus (those are the only two whose names I remember). I’d love to hear it. But I’m skeptical.


6 posted on 06/12/2024 9:49:33 AM PDT by CraigEsq (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: CraigEsq

Agree: and the clock is running.


7 posted on 06/12/2024 9:53:09 AM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CraigEsq

https://hotair.com/headlines/2024/06/03/dershowitz-supreme-court-should-take-up-trump-appeal-asap-n3789551


8 posted on 06/12/2024 9:56:21 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson