Posted on 06/07/2024 9:19:53 PM PDT by conservative98
Surprise. surprise.
Crooked juror in Trump case.
How many more?
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
G Larry wrote:
“
First, The NY Supreme Court informed Merchan of the finding, this wasn’t Merchan fessing up.
...
“
Is there a copy of the correspondence from the NY Supreme Court about this?
I assume he ment gitmo...?
Who knows? Maybe all of them.
No doubt. He, along with all the rest of the scum bags, will be speechless.
HaHa. I”m hearing Gallows Pole giving new meaning to a hung jury.
What really surprised me about the actions of NY v Trump is that Trump. with over 60 years of running construction projects in NY, employing thousands of people, with a network of connections miles long couldn’t get out of this? It is almost as if he set this up so he could be the victim of governmental persecution. Leveraging that with the black community in NYC they find a kindred spirit and sympathetic figure in Trump.
Or Guantanamo.
Courtesy of the insightful conservative98:
<><>The NY Supreme Court informed Merchan of the finding, this wasn’t Merchan fessing up.
<><>NYSC contacted Merchan after verification of the poster/juror connection,
<><>they h ad to verify there was contact between the two before the post.
<><>The verdict will be tossed
<><>Merchan wont get another bite at the apple in time to get a conviction before the election.
We live in NYS.
Hubby and I haven’t gotten a jury summons in years and we’re way overdue.
Wonder if my being a Trump donor, which is easily available public info, has anything to do with that...?
See where I’m going with this?
“It would seem that they decided together on a verdict prior to retiring to deliberate.”
Let’s face it; they had decided on a verdict prior to voir dire. Maybe not “together”, but each one knew how he’d vote, and the prosecution did, too. Otherwise, they wouldn’t have been there.
“Reminds me of early Gotti era cases where a juror or juries were bought off.”
I don’t think these necessarily bought off. They’re true believers in their commie cause. They did it for free — happily.
“the jury should be gagged too by being sequestered the whole trial.”
Considering that they, and everyone on the Prosecution side, are scofflaws, sequestering would not have helped. They’d have had MSNBC in their rooms 24/7, and would have been 100% accessible by the lawyers and lawyers’ minions. It would’ve been a joke.
Has it been verified that the FB poster is indeed related to one of the jurors? Or is he just an internet troll?
“I assume he ment gitmo...?”
I believe he did. Myself, I vote they cool their heels at Alcatraz until their respective Doomsdays. Gitmo is too tropical. Alcatraz, OTOH, is cold, windy, probably haunted, and surrounded by angry water. All it would take is a little remodeling.
“The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco.” ... credited to Mark Twain, but not Mark Twain.
That is a silly question. That would be 11. Not sarcasm.
People stricken with TDS tend to be ignorant and/or stupid (generally true of Democrats). It is entirely plausible this Michael Anderson guy actually did have this conversation with his cousin juror but lacked the mental capacity to remain quiet about it.
How many more? How about all of the rest of them?
this merchan weasel
imho is the one who forced the jury into a guilty verdict
with his jury instructions that turned the word unanimous on its head
and is trying to divert attention away from it
he knows trump will win
and doesn’t want to be charged with his crime and prosecuted after trump takes office
spit
Wow, this is hugh and series! No outsider ever, should have access to the jury? Are jurors not instructed to refrain from outside discussions of the case?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.