1 posted on
06/06/2024 7:41:10 PM PDT by
TomServo
To: TomServo
“Makes you wonder who they’re taking orders from.”
You are NOT supposed to come out like that if you want ANY hope of getting good coverage later. Now, if the WSJ runs a pro-Biden piece, that question could be turned on them by a Johnson or McCarthy. Not bright.
2 posted on
06/06/2024 7:49:10 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(Stormy Daniels is a McGuffin)
To: TomServo
Murdock is making grounds for another puppet at their convention.
3 posted on
06/06/2024 7:51:21 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: TomServo
Biden Administration response, “This report has all the makings of Russian disinformation.”
To: TomServo
The Biden team seethed? lol
It’s not like anyone over five can’t see that Joe’s a demented circus monkey who’s so frail he can barely walk.
8 posted on
06/06/2024 8:59:12 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Our Republic is under seige by globalist Marxists. Hold fast!)
To: TomServo
I subscribe to the Wall Street Journal - it’s pretty much the only national newspaper still out there which at least tries to be impartial and actually reports news instead of editorials masquerading as news.
To: TomServo
Oh he craps his diaper in public and they’re worried about an article about his age? Are his people actually this mentally retarded?
11 posted on
06/06/2024 9:15:09 PM PDT by
Bullish
(...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
The Rats will float Biden for as long as possible in order to best coordinate a swap.
14 posted on
06/06/2024 9:35:00 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist! )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson