As a result, there are far more than just citizen Trump being injured by this farce of a conviction. It involves serious implications to the Constitution in that it is election interference, which the Constitution does have direct involvement in.
The conviction allows the opposition to claim that Trump is a convicted felon, giving a potential advantage to one party in the election, and that is the incumbent party who are currently beyond the reach of the law.
The time & expense that Trump is saddled with based upon a complete sham of a trial, that was held unconstitutionally. The timing is also not without question, as it could have been brought many years ago. In fact, many legal entities rejected taking on the case. The time alone provides jeopardy of a tainted election process. The Supreme Court justices are beholden to uphold & protect the Constitution.
Your concerns are heard and taken into consideration, but I think not getting involved at this point in time overrides whatever concerns you have mentioned, because time is important for a quick ruling to either clear or confirm the sham trial. In fact, if the situation were reversed, I would also support the Supreme Court do a quick ruling.
If this was limited to just citizen Donald John Trump I might stand in aggrievance with you, if he were not the oppositions candidate, but this law case has far reaching impacts upon all citizens. If it an be done against him, it can be used to prosecute whomever they want to, and secure a conviction.
This is communism on display, and you think it has no Constitution crisis attached to it? I suggest you rethink your argument and the real consequences this has.
We already had a judge in New York that said the 2nd amendment has no place in HER court. The Supreme Court has to start being proactive on certain law cases ,otherwise, lawyers thrive while we lose freedoms & rights. No one should not have to spend large amounts of money to receive justice. That is the major obstacle of justice in this nation.
“ It involves serious implications to the Constitution in that it is election interference, which the Constitution does have direct involvement in.”
Where do you see anything in the Constitution about a national election to choose the President or a Federal right to vote in such an election if it exists?
All 50 State Legislatures retain the right to appoint Electors who will vote in the election that IS in the Constitution for Trump, they can do that even if he is in ADX Florence.
Before the Electors are appointed, o can’t see and Federal rights that are implicated (other that DJT’s numerous rights that were trampled in this farce).