This was downright treason the military brass pulled that day.
___________
Ok...no argument on that point. It is the clear definition of treason. The question of importance is what does PDJT say in the current campaign that he believes should happen when he gets back into office. He has already said he is fine with letting the crimes of ByeDone go by the wayside, didn’t he?
It’s one thing to think about what should happen in the future and it’s a other thing to campaign on it. The issue is what does he say that meets both the needs of justice and winning?
IMO, he doesn't say anything during the campaign. Those are two different battles involving two different battlefields. You may be unintentionally setting an insurmountable barrier for candidate Trump.
Only a future R president will be motivated and able to effectively seek justice in this instance. To campaign on the issue for election to that office will unnecessarily incur the utmost opposition of the political left and its 24/7 MSM.
As it stands, at the moment it is perhaps only one man's factually unsupported opinion that Milley and then-Army Secretary McCarthy were plotting to disobey any orders handed down by Trump.
These two experienced actors almost certainly didn't leave any credible evidence of their intentions behind. It sounds at best like an uphill battle.