Now about someone who constantly insults, without any point. Dimwit, low IQ, zeeper, pointless memes…., against FR rules, but “he” is still here
Posted on 02/24/2024 5:59:01 AM PST by SpeedyInTexas
This list only includes destroyed vehicles and equipment of which photo or videographic evidence is available. Therefore, the amount of equipment destroyed is significantly higher than recorded here. Loitering munitions, drones used as unmanned bait, civilian vehicles and derelict equipment are not included in this list. All possible effort has gone into avoiding duplicate entries and discerning the status of equipment between captured or abandoned. Many of the entries listed as 'abandoned' will likely end up captured or destroyed. Similarly, some of the captured equipment might be destroyed if it can't be recovered. When a vehicle is captured and then lost in service with its new owners, it is only added as a loss of the original operator to avoid double listings. When the origin of a piece of equipment can't be established, it's not included in the list. The Soviet flag is used when the equipment in question was produced prior to 1991. This list is constantly updated as additional footage becomes available.
(Excerpt) Read more at oryxspioenkop.com ...
Russia, such the innocent victim of invasion😎
Maybe 1000 Bradley’s set for demil, cost 0
Since Trump is President and you have the US giving the finger to the American people,🍈 that is disrespecting the President. Bye DU MEMBER
Lots of that GDP 🍈 loves to talk about😎
Shush, this will dishearten 🍈
Pure propaganda 😎
🍈 new material😂, you are as predictable as you are repetitious .
Now about someone who constantly insults, without any point. Dimwit, low IQ, zeeper, pointless memes…., against FR rules, but “he” is still here
Senior US and Ukrainian officials have said that the purpose of the temporary ceasefire is for Russia and Ukraine to demonstrate their willingness for peace and that the temporary ceasefire and negotiations to end the war are separate matters, whereas the Kremlin may intend to conjoin them. The US-Ukrainian joint statement announcing the temporary ceasefire proposal on March 11 noted that Ukraine and the United States intend to name their negotiating teams and immediately begin negotiations toward an enduring peace — noting the distinction between their March 11 temporary ceasefire proposal and future peace negotiations.[9] US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated on March 11 following the US-Ukrainian talks in Jeddah that the best goodwill gesture Russia can give would be to accept the ceasefire proposal and that if Russia says no, “then we'll know the impediment to peace.”[10] Rubio characterized Ukraine's agreement to the ceasefire as the “kind of concession you would need to see in order to end the conflict.”[11] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated on March 12 that Ukraine will use the 30-day ceasefire to prepare agreements with partners regarding a sustainable peace and long-term security guarantees.[12] The Kremlin's reported intention to make demands supporting its overall war objectives before agreeing to the temporary ceasefire violates the stated purpose of the ceasefire and the sequence of negotiations that US President Donald Trump has laid out. If the Kremlin holds the ceasefire hostage to demand preemptive concessions while continuing to pursue battlefield victories, that would strongly indicate that Russia lacks any urgency about ending the war and is uninterested in making any meaningful concessions.
Russian insider reports about the demands that the Kremlin may make before agreeing to the temporary ceasefire are in line with Russian officials’ public statements in the past months. Putin outlined in June 2024 — and reiterated in December 2024 — his prerequisite demands for agreeing to a ceasefire.[13] These demands include the full Ukrainian withdrawal from the territory in Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson oblasts that Russian forces currently do not occupy and Ukraine's official abandonment of its goal of joining NATO. Kremlin officials have repeatedly insisted that any peace negotiations to take into consideration the “realities on the ground,” and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov notably claimed on February 24 that Russia would only stop military activity in Ukraine when peace negotiations bring about a “solid, stable result that suits Russia” and account for the “realities” of the battlefield.[14] Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told Russian state newswire RIA Novosti on February 24 that Russia will not agree to a ceasefire that does not address the “root causes” of the war.[15] Kremlin officials, including Putin, have repeatedly claimed that any peace agreement must take into account the “root causes” of the war, which the Kremlin has defined as NATO's alleged violation of obligations not to expand eastward and the Ukrainian government's alleged discrimination against ethnic Russians and Russian language, media, and culture in Ukraine.[16]
A leaked February 2025 document from a think tank close to the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) that outlined a possible Kremlin negotiating strategy is largely in line with the Kremlin's recent public rhetoric and the March 12 Russian insider source reports. The Washington Post reported on March 12 that a European intelligence service obtained a document from a Russian think tank close to the Russian FSB’s Fifth Service (which oversees operations in Ukraine among other things) written in the week before the February 18 US-Russian talks in Saudi Arabia.[17] The document states that a peace settlement to the war in Ukraine “cannot happen before 2026,” rejects the deployment of peacekeepers to Ukraine, and calls for recognition of Russia's sovereignty over occupied Ukraine. The document calls for the creation of a buffer zone on the international Ukrainian-Russian border, including near Bryansk and Belgorod oblasts, and a “demilitarized zone” in southern Ukraine near Odesa Oblast and occupied Crimea. The document also states that Russia needs to “completely dismantle” the current Ukrainian government and rejects a possible Ukrainian commitment to not join NATO or to hold elections that include pro-Russian parties as insufficient measures. The document rejects any US plans to continue supplying weapons to Ukraine after any future peace deal and any Ukrainian plans to maintain its current number of military personnel. The document outlines ways in which Russia can strengthen its negotiating position by exacerbating tensions between the United States and both the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the EU. The document also calls for Russia to grant the United States access to Russian-controlled minerals in occupied Ukraine and for the Kremlin to focus on normalizing its relations with the United States by restoring embassy functions and appointing Alexander Darchiev as the Russian Ambassador to the United States.
The Kremlin has followed through with many of the document's suggestions in recent weeks. Kremlin officials have recently rejected the possible deployment of European peacekeepers to Ukraine, have identified the 2022 peace negotiations in Istanbul (that would have effectively disarmed Ukraine, banned Ukraine from receiving any foreign weapons, and forced Ukraine to commit never to participate in military blocs), and have offered to sign investment deals with the United States to extract minerals in Russia and occupied Ukraine.[18] Recent Russian rhetoric has also increasingly attempted to drive wedges between the United States and Europe.[19] Putin asked Russian Chief of the General Staff Army General Valery Gerasimov during a visit to a Russian command post in Kursk Oblast on March 12 to “think in the future about creating a security zone” along the Ukrainian-Russian international border.[20]
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-march-12-2025
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/iran-update-march-12-2025
GUR drones attacked camouflaged drone production in Russia
According to RBC-Ukraine sources, long-range strike drones of the Main Intelligence Directorate struck a drone production site in the village of Obukhovo, Dzerzhinsky district, Kaluga region, on the evening of March 12. Production lines for assembling drones were located in the workshops of the Kaluga Aerated Concrete plant.
Due to a drone attack at Kaluga Airport, the “Carpet” plan was introduced, and all flights were canceled from 9:00 PM on March 12 to 6:00 AM on March 13. The governor of the Kaluga region confirmed this morning a nighttime drone attack on the region, hitting an industrial enterprise, a communications and energy infrastructure facility.
https://www.rbc.ua/rus/news/droni-gur-atakuvali-zamaskovane-virobnitstvo-1741859253.html
https://bsky.app/profile/maks23.bsky.social/post/3lkatytrlm224
20 sec video
It's amazing that Ukraine target intel can locate these types of facilities.
ruzzia has a serious opsec/comsec problem.
At first, security prevented firefighters from entering, claiming it was a "restricted" site.
After some time, access was granted, but low-lying pipes are obstructing the installation of lifting equipment for firefighting.
There is a high risk of the fire spreading even more, even to the oil storage located in the basement.
https://x.com/NOELreports/status/1900140632351420917
Ukraine’s success with drone attacks in Russia make Russia’s drone attacks in Ukraine look like amateur hour. Putin must be worried sick, if he is even told the truth.
Apparently AD is still ineffective against “falling debris “
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.