To: Red Badger
Didn’t bring in what dress?
2 posted on
01/27/2024 6:11:22 PM PST by
lasereye
To: lasereye

That particular style dress did not exist at the time she said the assault took place....................
4 posted on
01/27/2024 6:15:57 PM PST by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: lasereye
5 posted on
01/27/2024 6:18:48 PM PST by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
To: lasereye
The dress she claimed she was wearing at the attack, problem is, the dress make and style wasn’t even created yet for a few years. The judge didn’t find that admissible which is ridiculous. Everything the court did in this case shows they were just trying to get a guilty verdict, not be an impartial decider of facts. Just a kangaroo court railroad job.
Really disgusting.
9 posted on
01/27/2024 6:34:39 PM PST by
Bullish
(...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
To: lasereye
She claimed she had the dress she wore ‘that day’ hanging in her closet. It is not clear that the dress make existed during the time frame suggested as possible date range for the imaginary event.
18 posted on
01/28/2024 12:26:50 AM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson